Perman Sarah M, Ellenberg Jonas H, Grossestreuer Anne V, Gaieski David F, Leary Marion, Abella Benjamin S, Carr Brendan G
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2015 Mar;88:114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Time to achieve target temperature varies substantially for patients who undergo targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest. The association between arrival at target temperature and neurologic outcome is poorly understood. We hypothesized that shorter time from initiation of cooling to target temperature ("induction") will be associated with worse neurologic outcome, reflecting more profound underlying brain injury and impaired thermoregulatory control.
This was a multicenter retrospective study analyzing data from the Penn Alliance for Therapeutic Hypothermia (PATH) Registry. We examined the association between time from arrest to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) ("downtime"), ROSC to initiation of TTM ("pre-induction") and "induction" with cerebral performance category (CPC).
A total of 321 patients were analyzed, of whom 30.8% (99/321) had a good neurologic outcome. Downtime for survivors with good outcome was 11 (IQR 6-27) min vs. 21 (IQR 10-36) min (p=0.002) for those with poor outcome. Pre-induction did not vary between good and poor outcomes (98 (IQR 36-230) min vs. 114 (IQR 34-260) (p=ns)). Induction time in the good outcome cohort was 237 (IQR 142-361) min compared to 180 (IQR 100-276) min (p=0.004). Patients were categorized by induction time (<120min, 120-300min, >300min). Using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, initial rhythm, and downtime, induction time >300min was associated with good neurologic outcome when compared to those with an induction time <120min.
In this multicenter cohort of post-arrest TTM patients, shorter induction time was associated with poor neurologic outcome.
心脏骤停后接受目标温度管理(TTM)的患者达到目标温度的时间差异很大。到达目标温度与神经功能结局之间的关联尚不清楚。我们假设从开始降温到目标温度(“诱导期”)的时间越短,神经功能结局越差,这反映了潜在的脑损伤更严重且体温调节控制受损。
这是一项多中心回顾性研究,分析了宾夕法尼亚治疗性低温联盟(PATH)登记处的数据。我们研究了从心脏骤停到自主循环恢复(ROSC)的时间(“停搏时间”)、ROSC到开始TTM的时间(“诱导前期”)以及“诱导期”与脑功能分类(CPC)之间的关联。
共分析了321例患者,其中30.8%(99/321)神经功能结局良好。结局良好的幸存者停搏时间为11(四分位间距6 - 27)分钟,而结局不佳者为21(四分位间距10 - 36)分钟(p = 0.002)。诱导前期在结局良好和不佳者之间无差异(98(四分位间距36 - 230)分钟对114(四分位间距34 - 260)(p = 无显著差异))。结局良好组的诱导期时间为237(四分位间距142 - 361)分钟,而结局不佳组为180(四分位间距100 - 276)分钟(p = 0.004)。根据诱导期时间(<120分钟、120 - 300分钟、>300分钟)对患者进行分类。在对年龄、初始心律和停搏时间进行多变量逻辑回归调整后,与诱导期时间<120分钟的患者相比,诱导期时间>300分钟与良好的神经功能结局相关。
在这个心脏骤停后TTM患者的多中心队列中,较短的诱导期时间与较差的神经功能结局相关。