Suppr超能文献

两种即时检测设备用于空腹和餐后成年人毛细血管脂质筛查的比较。

Comparison of two point of care devices for capillary lipid screening in fasting and postprandial adults.

作者信息

Donato Leslie J, Deobald Gayle R, Wockenfus Amy M, Hornseth Jean M, Saenger Amy K, Karon Brad S

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2015 Feb;48(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of two point of care (POC) devices for capillary lipid screening in fasting and post-prandial adults.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fasting and post-prandial capillary whole blood samples collected from 57 adult donors were analyzed simultaneously on Cholestech LDX Lipid Profile (Alere San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA) cassettes and CardioChek Lipid Panel (Polymer Technology Systems, Indianapolis, IN) strips. Paired serum samples were collected from the same donors and analyzed with CDC-certified methods for total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-blanked triglycerides. Non-HDL-C (total cholesterol minus HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were calculated. Mean bias between capillary whole blood and serum laboratory lipids was calculated.

RESULTS

HDL-C measurements were not affected by triglyceride content on either device. However, both devices exhibited significant variability in triglyceride measurement relative to the reference method. Compared to reference methods, Cholestech was more accurate than CardioChek for non-HDL-C while CardioChek was more accurate for HDL-C. Among the calculated cardiovascular risk parameters (LDL-C and non-HDL-C), Cholestech-calculated non-HDL-C exhibited the least average bias in both fasting and postprandial samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal approach to capillary lipid screening may be to use Cholestech non-HDL cholesterol; as it exhibited little bias relative to CDC reference methods in both fasting and postprandial samples, facilitating lipid screening in non-fasting adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估两种即时检测(POC)设备在空腹和餐后成年人中进行毛细血管脂质筛查的性能。

设计与方法

从57名成年献血者采集的空腹和餐后毛细血管全血样本,同时在Cholestech LDX血脂分析系统(Alere San Diego公司,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥)检测卡和CardioChek血脂检测板(Polymer Technology Systems公司,印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯)试条上进行分析。从相同献血者采集配对血清样本,并用疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)认证的方法分析总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和非空腹甘油三酯。计算非HDL-C(总胆固醇减去HDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。计算毛细血管全血与血清实验室脂质之间的平均偏差。

结果

两种设备上的HDL-C测量均不受甘油三酯含量影响。然而,相对于参考方法,两种设备在甘油三酯测量方面均表现出显著变异性。与参考方法相比,Cholestech检测非HDL-C时比CardioChek更准确,而CardioChek检测HDL-C时更准确。在计算得出的心血管风险参数(LDL-C和非HDL-C)中,Cholestech计算的非HDL-C在空腹和餐后样本中的平均偏差最小。

结论

毛细血管脂质筛查的最佳方法可能是使用Cholestech检测非HDL胆固醇;因为它在空腹和餐后样本中相对于CDC参考方法的偏差均较小,便于在非空腹成年人中进行脂质筛查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验