Suppr超能文献

颈动脉和桡动脉储备波参数在终末期肾病中的预后价值。

Prognostic Value of Carotid and Radial Artery Reservoir-Wave Parameters in End-Stage Renal Disease.

机构信息

1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.

2 Division of Nephrology Faculty of Medicine Université Laval Québec Quebec Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e012314. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012314. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Abstract

Background Reservoir-wave approach is an alternative model of arterial hemodynamics based on the assumption that measured arterial pressure is composed of volume-related (reservoir pressure) and wave-related components (excess pressure). However, the clinical utility of reservoir-wave approach remains debatable. Methods and Results In a single-center cohort of 260 dialysis patients, we examined whether carotid and radial reservoir-wave parameters were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Central pulse pressure and augmentation index at 75 beats per minute were determined by radial arterial tonometry through generalized transfer function. Carotid and radial reservoir-wave analysis were performed to determine reservoir pressure and excess pressure integral. After a median follow-up of 32 months, 171 (66%) deaths and 88 (34%) cardiovascular deaths occurred. In Cox regression analysis, carotid excess pressure integral was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% CI , 1.14-1.54; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for all-cause and 1.45 (95% CI : 1.18-1.75; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for cardiovascular mortality. After adjustments for age, heart rate, sex, clinical characteristics and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, carotid excess pressure integral was consistently associated with increased risk of all-cause (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.30; 95% CI : 1.08-1.54; P=0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.31; 95% CI : 1.04-1.63; P=0.019). Conversely, there were no significant associations between radial reservoir-wave parameters, central pulse pressure, augmentation index at 75 beats per minute, pressure forward, pressure backward and reflection magnitude, and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for comorbidities. Conclusions These observations support the clinical value of reservoir-wave approach parameters of large central elastic vessels in end-stage renal disease.

摘要

背景

基于容积相关(储备压)和波相关(剩余压)分量组成的动脉血压假设,储备波方法是一种替代的动脉血流动力学模型。然而,储备波方法的临床实用性仍存在争议。

方法和结果

在单中心 260 例透析患者队列中,我们研究了颈动脉和桡动脉储备波参数与全因和心血管死亡率的关系。通过桡动脉张力测定的广义传递函数确定中心脉搏压和 75 次/分的增强指数。进行颈动脉和桡动脉储备波分析以确定储备压和剩余压积分。中位随访 32 个月后,171 例(66%)发生全因死亡,88 例(34%)发生心血管死亡。在 Cox 回归分析中,颈动脉剩余压积分与全因死亡的危险比为 1.33(95%CI,1.14-1.54;每增加 1 个标准差 P<0.001),与心血管死亡的危险比为 1.45(95%CI,1.18-1.75;每增加 1 个标准差 P<0.001)。在调整年龄、心率、性别、临床特征和颈股脉搏波速度后,颈动脉剩余压积分与全因死亡(每增加 1 个标准差的危险比为 1.30;95%CI,1.08-1.54;P=0.004)和心血管死亡(每增加 1 个标准差的危险比为 1.31;95%CI,1.04-1.63;P=0.019)风险增加相关。相反,在调整合并症后,桡动脉储备波参数、中心脉搏压、75 次/分的增强指数、正向压力、反向压力和反射幅度与全因或心血管死亡率之间无显著相关性。

结论

这些观察结果支持储备波方法参数在终末期肾病大中央弹性血管中的临床价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d717/6662378/026573403613/JAH3-8-e012314-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验