Zheng Yu, Lu Xiao, Li Jianan, Zhang Qingsha, Reinhardt Jan D
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu, China; Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20;177(3):894-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.034. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
This experimental study investigates the potential role of physiological ischemic training (PIT) of remote limbs on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and myocardial angiogenesis after myocardial ischemia.
Forty-two rabbits were assigned into six groups at random: sham-operated (SO), training only (TO), myocardial ischemia (MI), PIT, EPC promoter (PIT+), and EPC inhibitor (PIT-). MI was experimentally induced by implanting a constrictor around the left ventricular branch. The PIT procedure included three 3-min cycles of cuff inflations on the hind limbs followed by a 5 min reperfusion. VEGF mRNA, protein and EPC numbers were measured in plasma and myocardium. Capillary density (CD), coronary blood flow (CBF) and coronary collateral blood flow (CCBF) were also determined.
Groups were compared using non-parametric statistics and associations between agents were explored with fractional polynomial regression. VEGF-mRNA and -protein levels were highest in PIT+ and PIT. PIT differed significantly from SO, TO, MI, and PIT- regarding VEGF-mRNA and -protein in plasma and VEGF-protein in myocardium. EPCs were highest in PIT+ followed by PIT. PIT differed significantly from SO, TO, MI, and PIT- regarding plasma EPCs. CD, CCBF and CCBF/CBF were significantly increased in PIT+ and PIT as compared to controls. PIT- did not differ significantly from SO and TO. VEGF explained up to 43% of variance in EPCs. EPCs explained up to 87% of variance in CD. CD explained up to 97% of variance in CCBF and CCBF/CBF.
PIT stimulates VEGF-mediated mobilization of EPCs as well as angiogenesis and might be proven as a new treatment strategy for patients with coronary heart disease.
本实验研究探讨远端肢体生理性缺血训练(PIT)对心肌缺血后血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、内皮祖细胞(EPCs)及心肌血管生成的潜在作用。
42只兔随机分为6组:假手术组(SO)、单纯训练组(TO)、心肌缺血组(MI)、PIT组、EPC启动子组(PIT+)和EPC抑制剂组(PIT-)。通过在左心室分支周围植入缩窄器实验性诱导心肌缺血。PIT程序包括在后肢进行3个3分钟的袖带充气循环,随后再灌注5分钟。检测血浆和心肌中的VEGF mRNA、蛋白及EPC数量。还测定了毛细血管密度(CD)、冠状动脉血流量(CBF)和冠状动脉侧支血流量(CCBF)。
采用非参数统计对各组进行比较,并通过分数多项式回归探讨各因素之间的关联。PIT+组和PIT组的VEGF-mRNA和蛋白水平最高。在血浆VEGF-mRNA和蛋白以及心肌VEGF蛋白方面,PIT组与SO组、TO组、MI组和PIT-组有显著差异。EPCs在PIT+组中最高,其次是PIT组。在血浆EPCs方面,PIT组与SO组、TO组、MI组和PIT-组有显著差异。与对照组相比,PIT+组和PIT组的CD、CCBF和CCBF/CBF显著增加。PIT-组与SO组和TO组无显著差异。VEGF解释了EPCs中高达43%的变异。EPCs解释了CD中高达87%的变异。CD解释了CCBF和CCBF/CBF中高达97%的变异。
PIT刺激VEGF介导的EPCs动员以及血管生成,可能被证明是冠心病患者的一种新的治疗策略。