Tampakakis Emmanouil, Leary Peter J, Selby Van N, De Marco Teresa, Cappola Thomas P, Felker G Michael, Russell Stuart D, Kasper Edward K, Tedford Ryan J
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jan;3(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
This study sought to evaluate if diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG) can predict survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD).
Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary PH-LHD have worse prognosis than those with passive pulmonary hypertension. The transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) have commonly been used to identify high-risk patients. However, these parameters have significant shortcomings and do not always correlate with pulmonary vasculature remodeling. Recently, it has been suggested that DPG may be better a marker, yet its prognostic ability in patients with cardiomyopathy has not been fully assessed.
A retrospective cohort of 1,236 patients evaluated for unexplained cardiomyopathy at Johns Hopkins Hospital was studied. All patients underwent right heart catheterization and were followed until death, cardiac transplantation, or the end of the study period (mean time 4.4 years). The relationships between DPG, TPG, or PVR and survival in subjects with PH-LHD (n = 469) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.
DPG was not significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, p = 0.10) in PH-LHD whereas elevated TPG and PVR predicted death (HR: 1.02, p = 0.046; and HR: 1.11, p = 0.002, respectively). Similarly, DPG did not differentiate survivors from non-survivors at any selected cut points including a DPG of 7 mm Hg.
In this retrospective study of patients with cardiomyopathy and PH-LHD, an elevated DPG was not associated with worse survival.
本研究旨在评估舒张期肺压差(DPG)能否预测左心疾病所致肺动脉高压(PH-LHD)患者的生存率。
毛细血管后和毛细血管前合并存在的PH-LHD患者的预后比单纯被动性肺动脉高压患者更差。经肺压差(TPG)和肺血管阻力(PVR)常用于识别高危患者。然而,这些参数存在明显缺陷,且并不总是与肺血管重塑相关。最近有人提出DPG可能是一个更好的标志物,但其在心肌病患者中的预后评估能力尚未得到充分评估。
对约翰霍普金斯医院1236例因不明原因心肌病接受评估的患者进行回顾性队列研究。所有患者均接受了右心导管检查,并随访至死亡、心脏移植或研究期结束(平均时间4.4年)。采用Cox比例风险回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估DPG、TPG或PVR与PH-LHD患者(n = 469)生存率之间的关系。
在PH-LHD患者中,DPG与死亡率无显著相关性(风险比[HR]:1.02,p = 0.10),而TPG和PVR升高则预示着死亡(HR分别为:1.02,p = 0.046;以及HR:1.11,p = 0.002)。同样,在包括7 mmHg的DPG在内的任何选定切点处,DPG均无法区分存活者与非存活者。
在这项针对心肌病和PH-LHD患者的回顾性研究中,升高的DPG与较差的生存率无关。