Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术的前路与后路入路:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Higgins Brendan T, Barlow Daniel R, Heagerty Nathan E, Lin Tim J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):419-34. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the clinical, radiographic and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing primary THA performed via the anterior versus posterior approach. We searched numerous sources and eventually included 17 studies, totaling 2302 participants. In terms of post-operative pain and function, the anterior approach was significantly favored in 4 studies at short-term follow-up. Pooled estimates showed a significant difference in favor of the anterior approach in terms of length of stay and dislocations. Current evidence comparing outcomes following anterior versus posterior THA does not demonstrate clear superiority of either approach. Until more rigorous, randomized evidence is available, we recommend choice of surgical approach for THA be based on patient characteristics, surgeon experience and surgeon and patient preference.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较经前路与后路行初次全髋关节置换术(THA)患者的临床、影像学和手术结果。我们检索了众多来源,最终纳入了17项研究,共2302名参与者。在术后疼痛和功能方面,4项研究发现在短期随访中前路手术明显更具优势。汇总估计显示,在前路手术的住院时间和脱位方面存在显著差异。目前比较前路与后路THA术后结果的证据并未表明哪种方法具有明显优势。在获得更严格的随机证据之前,我们建议THA手术方式的选择应基于患者特征、外科医生经验以及外科医生和患者的偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验