Conelea Christine A, Walther Michael R, Freeman Jennifer B, Garcia Abbe M, Sapyta Jeffrey, Khanna Muniya, Franklin Martin
Bradley/Hasbro Children's Research Center and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Bradley/Hasbro Children's Research Center and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
Prior research has shown that youth with co-occurring tic disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may differ from those with non-tic-related OCD in terms of clinical characteristics and treatment responsiveness. A broad definition of "tic-related" was used to examine whether children with tics in the Pediatric OCD Treatment Study II differed from those without tics in terms of demographic and phenomenological characteristics and acute treatment outcomes.
Participants were 124 youth aged 7 to 17 years, inclusive, with a primary diagnosis of OCD who were partial responders to an adequate serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) trial. Participants were randomized to medication management, medication management plus instructions in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), or medication management plus full CBT. Tic status was based on the presence of motor and/or vocal tics on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale.
Tics were identified in 53% of the sample. Those with tic-related OCD did not differ from those with non-tic-related OCD in terms of age, family history of tics, OCD severity, OCD-related impairment, or comorbidity. Those with tics responded equally in all treatment conditions.
Tic-related OCD was very prevalent using a broad definition of tic status. Results suggest that youth with this broad definition of tic-related OCD do not have increased OCD severity or inference, higher comorbidity rates or severity, or worsened functioning, and support the use of CBT in this population. This highlights the importance of not making broad assumptions about OCD symptoms most likely to occur in an individual with comorbid tics. Clinical trial registration information-Treatment of Pediatric OCD for SRI Partial Responders; http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00074815.
先前的研究表明,患有抽动障碍和强迫症(OCD)的青少年在临床特征和治疗反应性方面可能与非抽动相关强迫症患者不同。本研究采用了“抽动相关”的宽泛定义,以检验在儿科强迫症治疗研究II中患有抽动的儿童与未患抽动的儿童在人口统计学和现象学特征以及急性治疗结果方面是否存在差异。
参与者为124名年龄在7至17岁之间(含7岁和17岁)的青少年,他们被初步诊断为强迫症,且对足量的5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SRI)试验部分反应不佳。参与者被随机分为药物管理组、药物管理加认知行为疗法(CBT)指导组或药物管理加完整CBT组。抽动状态基于耶鲁综合抽动严重程度量表上运动和/或发声抽动的存在情况。
53%的样本被确定有抽动。抽动相关强迫症患者在年龄、抽动家族史、强迫症严重程度、强迫症相关损害或共病方面与非抽动相关强迫症患者没有差异。有抽动的患者在所有治疗条件下反应相同。
使用宽泛的抽动状态定义,抽动相关强迫症非常普遍。结果表明,具有这种宽泛定义的抽动相关强迫症的青少年并没有更高的强迫症严重程度或干扰、更高的共病率或严重程度,或更差的功能状况,并支持在该人群中使用CBT。这突出了不要对合并抽动的个体中最可能出现的强迫症症状做出宽泛假设的重要性。临床试验注册信息——SRI部分反应者的儿科强迫症治疗;http://clinicaltrials.gov;NCT00074815。