Skripcak Tomas, Belka Claus, Bosch Walter, Brink Carsten, Brunner Thomas, Budach Volker, Büttner Daniel, Debus Jürgen, Dekker Andre, Grau Cai, Gulliford Sarah, Hurkmans Coen, Just Uwe, Krause Mechthild, Lambin Philippe, Langendijk Johannes A, Lewensohn Rolf, Lühr Armin, Maingon Philippe, Masucci Michele, Niyazi Maximilian, Poortmans Philip, Simon Monique, Schmidberger Heinz, Spezi Emiliano, Stuschke Martin, Valentini Vincenzo, Verheij Marcel, Whitfield Gillian, Zackrisson Björn, Zips Daniel, Baumann Michael
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Dec;113(3):303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Disconnected cancer research data management and lack of information exchange about planned and ongoing research are complicating the utilisation of internationally collected medical information for improving cancer patient care. Rapidly collecting/pooling data can accelerate translational research in radiation therapy and oncology. The exchange of study data is one of the fundamental principles behind data aggregation and data mining. The possibilities of reproducing the original study results, performing further analyses on existing research data to generate new hypotheses or developing computational models to support medical decisions (e.g. risk/benefit analysis of treatment options) represent just a fraction of the potential benefits of medical data-pooling. Distributed machine learning and knowledge exchange from federated databases can be considered as one beyond other attractive approaches for knowledge generation within "Big Data". Data interoperability between research institutions should be the major concern behind a wider collaboration. Information captured in electronic patient records (EPRs) and study case report forms (eCRFs), linked together with medical imaging and treatment planning data, are deemed to be fundamental elements for large multi-centre studies in the field of radiation therapy and oncology. To fully utilise the captured medical information, the study data have to be more than just an electronic version of a traditional (un-modifiable) paper CRF. Challenges that have to be addressed are data interoperability, utilisation of standards, data quality and privacy concerns, data ownership, rights to publish, data pooling architecture and storage. This paper discusses a framework for conceptual packages of ideas focused on a strategic development for international research data exchange in the field of radiation therapy and oncology.
癌症研究数据管理脱节,且缺乏关于计划中和正在进行的研究的信息交流,这使得利用国际收集的医学信息改善癌症患者护理变得复杂。快速收集/整合数据可以加速放射治疗和肿瘤学的转化研究。研究数据的交换是数据聚合和数据挖掘背后的基本原则之一。重现原始研究结果、对现有研究数据进行进一步分析以产生新假设或开发计算模型以支持医疗决策(例如治疗方案的风险/效益分析)的可能性,只是医学数据整合潜在益处的一小部分。分布式机器学习和来自联邦数据库的知识交换可被视为“大数据”中知识生成的一种极具吸引力的方法。研究机构之间的数据互操作性应是更广泛合作背后的主要关注点。电子病历(EPR)和研究病例报告表(eCRF)中捕获的信息,与医学影像和治疗计划数据链接在一起,被视为放射治疗和肿瘤学领域大型多中心研究的基本要素。为了充分利用捕获的医学信息,研究数据必须不仅仅是传统(不可修改)纸质CRF的电子版。必须解决的数据互操作性、标准的使用、数据质量和隐私问题、数据所有权、发布权、数据整合架构和存储等挑战。本文讨论了一个概念性思想包的框架,重点是放射治疗和肿瘤学领域国际研究数据交换的战略发展。