Fan Jessie X, Wen Ming, Wan Neng
Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225 S 1400 E AEB 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0080.
Department of Sociology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Rm 301, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0250.
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
The purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences.
本研究旨在调查三种主动通勤(AC)方式的参与率在城乡之间的差异及其与建成环境的相关性。利用2010年人口普查数据并辅以其他数据集,分析了70172个普查区中16岁及以上工人步行、骑自行车或乘坐公共交通工具上班的AC率,其中包括12844个农村普查区和57328个城市普查区。采用随机截距分数logit回归来处理零膨胀数据以及各县内普查区的聚类问题。我们发现,步行上班的平均AC率农村为3.44%,城市为2.77%(p<0.01);骑自行车上班的平均AC率农村为0.40%,城市为0.58%(p<0.01);乘坐公共交通工具上班的平均AC率农村为0.59%,城市为5.86%(p<0.01)。一些环境变量在农村和城市普查区与AC有着相似的关系,比如普查区绿化程度与步行上班普及率之间呈负相关。另一些变量在农村和城市的相关方向则相反,比如步行上班的街道连通性以及步行上班和乘坐公共交通工具上班两者的人口密度。我们得出结论,农村地区是AC与环境关系中的一个重要调节因素。在制定促进AC的策略时,需要关注城乡差异,以避免产生意外后果。