• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建成环境与主动通勤:美国城乡差异

Built Environment and Active Commuting: Rural-Urban Differences in the U.S.

作者信息

Fan Jessie X, Wen Ming, Wan Neng

机构信息

Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225 S 1400 E AEB 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0080.

Department of Sociology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Rm 301, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0250.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007
PMID:29124104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5673263/
Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate rural-urban differences in participation rates in three modes of active commuting (AC) and their built environmental correlates. The 2010 Census supplemented with other datasets were used to analyze AC rates in percent of workers age 16+ walking, biking, or taking public transportation to work in 70,172 Census tracts, including 12,844 rural and 57,328 urban. Random-intercept factional logit regressions were used to account for zero-inflated data and for clustering of tracts within counties. We found that the average AC rates were 3.44% rural and 2.77% urban (p<0.01) for walking to work, 0.40% rural and 0.58% urban (p<0.01) for biking to work, and 0.59% rural and 5.86% urban (p<0.01) for public transportation to work. Some environmental variables had similar relationships with AC in rural and urban tracts, such as a negative association between tract greenness and prevalence of walking to work. Others had opposite correlational directions for rural vs. urban, such as street connectivity for walking to work and population density for both walking to work and public transportation to work. We concluded that rurality is an important moderator in AC-environment relationships. In developing strategies to promote AC, attention needs to be paid to rural-urban differences to avoid unintended consequences.

摘要

本研究旨在调查三种主动通勤(AC)方式的参与率在城乡之间的差异及其与建成环境的相关性。利用2010年人口普查数据并辅以其他数据集,分析了70172个普查区中16岁及以上工人步行、骑自行车或乘坐公共交通工具上班的AC率,其中包括12844个农村普查区和57328个城市普查区。采用随机截距分数logit回归来处理零膨胀数据以及各县内普查区的聚类问题。我们发现,步行上班的平均AC率农村为3.44%,城市为2.77%(p<0.01);骑自行车上班的平均AC率农村为0.40%,城市为0.58%(p<0.01);乘坐公共交通工具上班的平均AC率农村为0.59%,城市为5.86%(p<0.01)。一些环境变量在农村和城市普查区与AC有着相似的关系,比如普查区绿化程度与步行上班普及率之间呈负相关。另一些变量在农村和城市的相关方向则相反,比如步行上班的街道连通性以及步行上班和乘坐公共交通工具上班两者的人口密度。我们得出结论,农村地区是AC与环境关系中的一个重要调节因素。在制定促进AC的策略时,需要关注城乡差异,以避免产生意外后果。

相似文献

1
Built Environment and Active Commuting: Rural-Urban Differences in the U.S.建成环境与主动通勤:美国城乡差异
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of active commuting in rural America.美国农村地区主动通勤的社会人口学和环境关联因素
J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12084. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
3
An ecological analysis of environmental correlates of active commuting in urban U.S.美国城市中主动通勤与环境关联的生态分析
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
4
Demographic factors, workplace factors and active transportation use in the USA: a secondary analysis of 2009 NHTS data.美国的人口统计学因素、工作场所因素与主动出行使用情况:对2009年美国国家交通调查数据的二次分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):480-486. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207820. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
5
Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014.2014年美国城乡成年乘用车乘客死亡及安全带使用情况差异
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Sep 22;66(17):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6617a1.
6
Can Walking or Biking to Work Really Make a Difference? Compact Development, Observed Commuter Choice and Body Mass Index.步行或骑自行车上班真的会有不同吗?紧凑型发展、观察到的通勤选择与身体质量指数。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0130903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130903. eCollection 2015.
7
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.社区建成环境和社会经济地位与大学生的主动通勤和久坐行为相关,但与休闲时间体力活动无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
8
A pan-Canadian measure of active living environments using open data.利用开放数据进行泛加 拿大积极生活环境的测量。
Health Rep. 2019 May 15;30(5):16-25. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x201900500002-eng.
9
Associations of street layout with walking and sedentary behaviors in an urban and a rural area of Japan.日本城乡地区街道布局与步行及久坐行为的关联。
Health Place. 2017 May;45:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
10
Exploring Neighborhood Environments and Active Commuting in Chennai, India.探索印度钦奈的社区环境和积极通勤。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 26;15(9):1840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091840.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjectively-measured Environmental Support for Physical Activity, Healthy Eating, and Breastfeeding in the Rural United States: A Scoping Review to Inform Opportunities for Public Health Surveillance.美国农村地区对体育活动、健康饮食和母乳喂养的主观测量环境支持:一项为公共卫生监测机会提供信息的范围综述
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2025 Feb 1;5(1):31-63. eCollection 2025.
2
Objectively-measured Environmental Support for Physical Activity, Healthy Eating, and Breastfeeding in the Rural United States: A Scoping Review to Inform Opportunities for Public Health Surveillance.美国农村地区体力活动、健康饮食和母乳喂养的客观测量环境支持:一项为公共卫生监测机会提供信息的范围综述
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2025 Feb 1;5(1):1-30. eCollection 2025.
3
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Momentary Associations Between Availability of Physical Activity Space and Physical Activity Opportunities Among Children from Rural, Urban, and Suburban Locales.农村、城市和郊区儿童身体活动空间可用性与身体活动机会之间瞬间关联的生态瞬时评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;21(12):1586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121586.
4
Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity, Fitness and Indicators of Cardiometabolic Risk among Rural Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study at 15-Year Follow-up of the MINIMat Cohort.加速度计测量的身体活动、体能和农村青少年心血管代谢风险指标:MINIMat 队列 15 年随访的横断面研究。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):987-1003. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00245-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Built and natural environment correlates of physical activity of adults living in rural areas: a systematic review.农村地区成年人体力活动的建成和自然环境相关性:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 3;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01598-3.
6
Assessing the association between food environment and dietary inflammation by community type: a cross-sectional REGARDS study.评估社区类型与饮食炎症之间的食物环境关联:一项横断面 REGARDS 研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 Sep 20;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00345-4.
7
The role of the perceived environment for recreational walking among adults in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations: A study using walk-along interviews.社会经济条件不利情况下成年人休闲步行中感知环境的作用:一项采用随行访谈的研究
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 8;23:101456. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101456. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Social Inequalities in the Association between Social Infrastructure and Mental Health: An Observational Cross-Sectional Analysis of Children and Adolescents in Germany.社会基础设施与心理健康之间关联的社会不平等:德国儿童和青少年的观察性横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6760. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116760.
9
Urban-rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions.美国儿童肥胖环境的城乡差异:不同农村定义的应用。
J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):121-135. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12677. Epub 2022 May 30.
10
Categorizing community type for epidemiologic evaluation of community factors and chronic disease across the United States.对美国各地社区因素和慢性病进行流行病学评估时对社区类型进行分类。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2022;5(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100250. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.识别与衡量与步行便利性相关的城市设计品质。
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S223-S240. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223.
2
An ecological analysis of environmental correlates of active commuting in urban U.S.美国城市中主动通勤与环境关联的生态分析
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
3
Rural-urban differences in objective and subjective measures of physical activity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006.城乡地区身体活动客观和主观指标的差异:来自2003 - 2006年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的结果
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Aug 21;11:E141. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140189.
4
Geographic scale matters in detecting the relationship between neighbourhood food environments and obesity risk: an analysis of driver license records in Salt Lake County, Utah.地理尺度在检测邻里食物环境与肥胖风险之间的关系中很重要:对犹他州盐湖县驾照记录的分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 19;4(8):e005458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005458.
5
Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of active commuting in rural America.美国农村地区主动通勤的社会人口学和环境关联因素
J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12084. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
6
Social ecological influences on work-related active commuting among adults.社会生态因素对成年人与工作相关的主动通勤的影响。
Am J Health Behav. 2013 Jul;37(4):543-54. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.4.12.
7
Rural-urban differences in health behaviors and implications for health status among US cancer survivors.城乡癌症幸存者健康行为差异及其对健康状况的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Aug;24(8):1481-90. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0225-x. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Population-Adjusted Street Connectivity, Urbanicity and Risk of Obesity in the U.S.美国经人口调整后的街道连通性、城市化程度与肥胖风险
Appl Geogr. 2013 Jul;41:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.006.
9
Prevalence of obesity among adults from rural and urban areas of the United States: findings from NHANES (2005-2008).美国城乡成年人肥胖症患病率:NHANES(2005-2008 年)调查结果。
J Rural Health. 2012 Fall;28(4):392-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00411.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?身体活动的相关因素:为什么有些人积极参加身体活动,而有些人不这样做?
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):258-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1.