Kadowaki Joy, Vuolo Mike, Kelly Brian C
Department of Sociology, Purdue University, 700 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Health Place. 2015 Jan;31:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
In this article, we present the results of a systematic review of state, county, and municipal restrictions on the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in public spaces within the United States, alongside an overview of the current legal landscape. The lack of federal guidance leaves lower-level jurisdictions to debate the merits of restrictions on use in public spaces without sufficient scientific research. As we show through a geographic assessment of restrictions, this has resulted in an inconsistent patchwork of e-cigarette use bans across the United States of varying degrees of coverage. Bans have emerged over time in a manner that suggests a "bottom up" diffusion of e-cigarette clean air policies. Ultimately, the lack of clinical and scientific knowledge on the risks and potential harm reduction benefits has led to precautionary policymaking, which often lacks grounding in empirical evidence and results in spatially uneven diffusion of policy.
在本文中,我们展示了一项关于美国州、县和市对公共场所使用电子烟限制的系统评价结果,同时概述了当前的法律状况。由于缺乏联邦指导,下级司法管辖区在没有充分科学研究的情况下,就公共场所使用限制的利弊展开辩论。正如我们通过对限制措施的地理评估所表明的那样,这导致了美国各地电子烟使用禁令参差不齐,覆盖程度各不相同。随着时间的推移,禁令以一种表明电子烟清洁空气政策“自下而上”传播的方式出现。最终,由于缺乏关于风险和潜在危害降低益处的临床和科学知识,导致了预防性政策制定,而这种政策制定往往缺乏实证依据,导致政策在空间上的不均衡传播。