Suppr超能文献

美国各州电子烟政策实施的模式、集群和转变:2010 - 2020年

Patterns, clusters, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation: 2010-2020.

作者信息

Zaborenko Callie, Vuolo Mike, Maggs Jennifer L, Staff Jeremy, Kelly Brian C

机构信息

Dept of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Dept of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 13;4(11):e0003636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003636. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as e-cigarettes, have become increasingly used across the world. To respond to global public health challenges associated with vaping, governments have implemented numerous ENDS policies. This research highlights the patterns, clustering, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation from 2010 to 2020. Policy data for tobacco and ENDS policies primarily from the Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation (ANRF) were analyzed for the years 2010 to 2020 for all fifty states and Washington, D.C. Patterns and clusters of policies were assessed. Latent trajectories were modeled for ENDS policies across states over time. ENDS policies commonly have analogous tobacco control policies in place prior to their implementation. ENDS policies in states were commonly implemented in "bundles." The temporal trajectories of ENDS policy implementation occurred in 3 latent forms. A majority of states were "catch-up implementers," indicating their slow initial implementation but stronger position by the end of the period of observation in 2020. These trajectories of ENDS policies were not associated with any individual tobacco control policy in place at the start of the trajectory in 2010. The development of ENDS policies in U.S. states has been temporally and geographically uneven. Many states that had initially been slow to implement ENDS policies caught up by 2020. The implementation of policy "bundles" was common. The clustering of policies in bundles has important methodological implications for analyses, which should be considered in ENDS policy evaluations.

摘要

电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS),如电子烟,在全球范围内的使用越来越广泛。为应对与吸电子烟相关的全球公共卫生挑战,各国政府已实施了众多ENDS政策。本研究重点关注了2010年至2020年美国各州ENDS政策实施的模式、聚类情况和转变。对2010年至2020年期间来自美国非吸烟者权利基金会(ANRF)的烟草和ENDS政策的政策数据,针对所有50个州和华盛顿特区进行了分析。评估了政策模式和聚类情况。对各州ENDS政策随时间的潜在轨迹进行了建模。ENDS政策在实施前通常已有类似的烟草控制政策。各州的ENDS政策通常以“捆绑”形式实施。ENDS政策实施的时间轨迹呈现出3种潜在形式。大多数州是“追赶实施者”,这表明它们初期实施缓慢,但在2020年观察期结束时处于更有利的地位。这些ENDS政策轨迹与2010年轨迹开始时实施的任何一项单独的烟草控制政策均无关联。美国各州ENDS政策的发展在时间和地理上并不均衡。许多最初实施ENDS政策缓慢的州到2020年时实现了追赶。政策“捆绑”实施很常见。政策聚类成捆绑形式对分析具有重要的方法学意义,在ENDS政策评估中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76fa/11560037/e7cefe11e50e/pgph.0003636.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验