Weesendorp Eefke, Backer Jantien, Loeffen Willie
Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, Department of Epidemiology, Crisis Management and Diagnostics, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, Department of Epidemiology, Crisis Management and Diagnostics, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Dec 5;174(3-4):353-361. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.10.022. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
During outbreaks of classical swine fever (CSF), CSF virus (CSFV) can be transmitted via different routes. Understanding these transmission routes is crucial in preventing the unlimited spread of the virus in a naïve population, and the subsequent eradication of the virus from that population. The objectives of the present study were to quantify virus transmission within a compartment, differentiating between transmission within a pen, transmission between pens via contact through (open) pen partitions, and transmission via the air. Furthermore, the possible contribution of each of these routes to infection of individual pigs was quantified. A CSFV outbreak was mimicked in a compartment housing 24 pigs in six different pens. Two pigs in one pen were inoculated with the moderately virulent Paderborn strain, and virus transmission to other pigs was followed in time. Virus transmission rates for transmission via the air (β of 0.33 (0.14-0.64) per day) and transmission between adjacent pens (β of 0.30 (0-0.88) per day) were comparable, but significantly lower than for virus transmission within a pen (β of 6.1 (0.86-18) per day). The route via the air created new focal points of infection, from which virus transmission continued through other routes. This shows that, at least within a compartment, transmission via the air is expected to play a relevant role in the fast spread of the virus after an initial slow start. This will have consequences for efficacy of intervention measures, including vaccination during an outbreak.
在经典猪瘟(CSF)暴发期间,CSF病毒(CSFV)可通过不同途径传播。了解这些传播途径对于防止病毒在未感染群体中无限制传播以及随后从该群体中根除病毒至关重要。本研究的目的是量化一个隔间内的病毒传播情况,区分栏内传播、通过(开放式)栏间隔板接触在栏间传播以及空气传播。此外,还对这些传播途径中每一种对个体猪感染的可能贡献进行了量化。在一个有六个不同猪栏、饲养24头猪的隔间内模拟了一次CSFV暴发。在一个猪栏中给两头猪接种了中等毒力的帕德博恩毒株,并及时跟踪病毒向其他猪的传播情况。空气传播的病毒传播率(每天β为0.33(0.14 - 0.64))和相邻猪栏间传播的病毒传播率(每天β为0.30(0 - 0.88))相当,但显著低于栏内病毒传播率(每天β为6.1(0.86 - 18))。空气传播途径产生了新的感染焦点,病毒从这些焦点通过其他途径继续传播。这表明,至少在一个隔间内,空气传播预计在病毒初始缓慢传播后快速传播过程中发挥重要作用。这将对干预措施的效果产生影响,包括暴发期间的疫苗接种。