Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Südufer 10, 17493, Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany.
Vet Res. 2017 Nov 28;48(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0490-x.
For the global pig industry, classical (CSF) and African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks are a constantly feared threat. Except for Sardinia, ASF was eradicated in Europe in the late 1990s, which led to a research focus on CSF because this disease continued to be present. However, ASF remerged in eastern Europe in 2007 and the interest in the disease, its control and epidemiology increased tremendously. The similar names and the same susceptible species suggest a similarity of the two viral diseases, a related biological behaviour and, correspondingly, similar epidemiological features. However, there are several essential differences between both diseases, which need to be considered for the design of control or preventive measures. In the present review, we aimed to collate differences and similarities of the two diseases that impact epidemiology and thus the necessary control actions. Our objective was to discuss critically, if and to which extent the current knowledge can be transferred from one disease to the other and where new findings should lead to a critical review of measures relating to the prevention, control and surveillance of ASF and CSF. Another intention was to identify research gaps, which need to be closed to increase the chances of a successful eradication of ASF and therefore for a decrease of the economic threat for pig holdings and the international trade.
对于全球养猪业而言,经典猪瘟(Classical Swine Fever,CSF)和非洲猪瘟(African Swine Fever,ASF)的爆发是一种持续存在的威胁。除撒丁岛外,欧洲在 20 世纪 90 年代末根除了 ASF,这导致了对 CSF 的研究重点,因为这种疾病仍然存在。然而,ASF 于 2007 年在东欧再次出现,人们对该病的兴趣、其控制和流行病学研究大大增加。相似的名称和相同的易感物种表明这两种病毒性疾病具有相似性,具有相关的生物学行为,相应地也具有相似的流行病学特征。然而,这两种疾病之间存在着几个重要的区别,在设计控制或预防措施时需要加以考虑。在本综述中,我们旨在整理这两种疾病在流行病学方面的异同,从而为必要的控制措施提供参考。我们的目的是批判性地讨论,如果可以将一种疾病的现有知识转移到另一种疾病,以及在何种程度上可以转移,以及在何种程度上需要对与 ASF 和 CSF 的预防、控制和监测相关的措施进行批判性审查。另一个目的是确定需要解决的研究差距,以增加成功根除 ASF 的机会,从而降低养猪场和国际贸易的经济威胁。