Opie Rachelle S, O'Neil Adrienne, Itsiopoulos Catherine, Jacka Felice N
1Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences,La Trobe University,Melbourne,VIC 3086,Australia.
2IMPACT Strategic Research Centre,School of Medicine,Deakin University,Geelong,Victoria,Australia.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(11):2074-93. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002614. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Non-pharmacological approaches to the treatment of depression and anxiety are of increasing importance, with emerging evidence supporting a role for lifestyle factors in the development of these disorders. Observational evidence supports a relationship between habitual diet quality and depression. Less is known about the causative effects of diet on mental health outcomes. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken of randomised controlled trials of dietary interventions that used depression and/or anxiety outcomes and sought to identify characteristics of programme success.
A systematic search of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and PyscInfo databases was conducted for articles published between April 1971 and May 2014.
Of the 1274 articles identified, seventeen met eligibility criteria and were included. All reported depression outcomes and ten reported anxiety or total mood disturbance. Compared with a control condition, almost half (47%) of the studies observed significant effects on depression scores in favour of the treatment group. The remaining studies reported a null effect. Effective dietary interventions were based on a single delivery mode, employed a dietitian and were less likely to recommend reducing red meat intake, select leaner meat products or follow a low-cholesterol diet.
Although there was a high level of heterogeneity, we found some evidence for dietary interventions improving depression outcomes. However, as only one trial specifically investigated the impact of a dietary intervention in individuals with clinical depression, appropriately powered trials that examine the effects of dietary improvement on mental health outcomes in those with clinical disorders are required.
非药物治疗抑郁症和焦虑症的方法日益重要,新出现的证据支持生活方式因素在这些疾病发展中的作用。观察性证据支持习惯性饮食质量与抑郁症之间的关系。关于饮食对心理健康结果的因果影响知之甚少。因此,对使用抑郁症和/或焦虑症结果的饮食干预随机对照试验进行了系统评价,以确定项目成功的特征。
对Cochrane、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PubMed和PyscInfo数据库进行系统检索,查找1971年4月至2014年5月发表的文章。
在识别出的1274篇文章中,17篇符合纳入标准并被纳入。所有研究均报告了抑郁症结果,10项研究报告了焦虑或总体情绪障碍。与对照条件相比,近一半(47%)的研究观察到治疗组在抑郁症评分上有显著效果。其余研究报告无效果。有效的饮食干预基于单一的提供模式,聘请了营养师,不太可能建议减少红肉摄入量、选择瘦肉产品或遵循低胆固醇饮食。
尽管存在高度异质性,但我们发现了一些饮食干预改善抑郁症结果的证据。然而,由于只有一项试验专门研究了饮食干预对临床抑郁症患者的影响,因此需要有足够样本量的试验来研究饮食改善对临床疾病患者心理健康结果的影响。