Manze Meredith G, Orner Michelle B, Glickman Mark, Pbert Lori, Berlowitz Dan, Kressin Nancy R
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VAMC, Bedford, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Feb;98(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Hypertension remains a prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and improved medication adherence leads to better blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to improve medication adherence and hypertension outcomes among patients with uncontrolled BP through communication skills training targeting providers.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a communication skills intervention for primary care doctors compared to usual care controls, on the outcomes of BP (systolic, diastolic), patient self-reported medication adherence, and provider counseling, assessed at baseline and post-intervention. We enrolled 379 patients with uncontrolled BP; 203 (54%) with follow-up data comprised our final sample. We performed random effects least squares regression analyses to examine whether the provider training improved outcomes, using clinics as the unit of randomization.
In neither unadjusted nor multivariate analyses were significant differences in change detected from baseline to follow-up in provider counseling, medication adherence or BP, for the intervention versus control groups.
The intervention did not improve the outcomes; it may have been too brief and lacked sufficient practice level changes to impact counseling, adherence or BP.
Future intervention efforts may require more extensive provider training, along with broader systematic changes, to improve patient outcomes.
高血压仍然是心血管疾病的常见危险因素,提高药物依从性有助于更好地控制血压(BP)。我们试图通过针对医疗服务提供者的沟通技能培训,来提高血压控制不佳患者的药物依从性和改善高血压治疗效果。
我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估针对初级保健医生的沟通技能干预与常规护理对照相比,对血压(收缩压、舒张压)、患者自我报告的药物依从性以及医疗服务提供者咨询情况的影响,这些指标在基线和干预后进行评估。我们招募了379名血压控制不佳的患者;203名(54%)有随访数据的患者组成了我们的最终样本。我们进行了随机效应最小二乘回归分析,以诊所作为随机分组单位,检验医疗服务提供者培训是否改善了治疗效果。
在未调整分析和多变量分析中,干预组与对照组相比,从基线到随访期间,医疗服务提供者咨询、药物依从性或血压的变化均未发现显著差异。
该干预措施并未改善治疗效果;它可能过于简短,且缺乏足够的实践层面的改变来影响咨询、依从性或血压。
未来的干预措施可能需要更广泛的医疗服务提供者培训,以及更广泛的系统性改变,以改善患者的治疗效果。