Zlotogorski-Hurvitz Ayelet, Dayan Dan, Chaushu Gavriel, Korvala Johanna, Salo Tuula, Sormunen Raija, Vered Marilena
Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (AZH, DD, MV)
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (GC)
J Histochem Cytochem. 2015 Mar;63(3):181-9. doi: 10.1369/0022155414564219. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
ExoQuick-TC(TM) (EQ), a chemical-based agent designed to precipitate exosomes, was calibrated for use on saliva collected from healthy individuals. The morphological and molecular features of the precipitations were compared with those obtained using the classical, physical-based method of ultracentrifugation (UC). Electron microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy with anti-CD63 showed vesicular nanoparticles surrounded by bi-layered membrane, compatible with exosomes in EQ, similar to that observed with UC. Atomic force microscopy highlighted larger, irregularly shaped/aggregated EQ nanoparticles that contrasted with the single, round-shaped UC nanoparticles. ELISA (performed on 0.5 ml of saliva) revealed a tendency for a higher expression of the specific exosomal markers (CD63, CD9, CD81) in EQ than in UC (p>0.05). ELISA for epithelial growth factor receptor, a non-exosomal-related marker, showed a significantly higher concentration in EQ than in UC (p=0.04). Western blotting of equal total-protein concentrations revealed bands of CD63, CD9 and CD81 in both types of preparations, although they were less pronounced in EQ compared with UC. This may be related to a higher fraction of non-exosomal proteins in EQ. In conclusion, EQ is suitable and efficient for precipitation of salivary exosomes from small volumes of saliva; however, EQ tends to be associated with considerably more biological impurities (non-exosomal-related proteins/microvesicles) as compared with UC.
ExoQuick-TC(TM)(EQ)是一种旨在沉淀外泌体的化学试剂,已针对从健康个体收集的唾液进行了校准。将沉淀物的形态学和分子特征与使用经典的基于物理方法的超速离心(UC)所获得的特征进行了比较。电子显微镜和抗CD63免疫电子显微镜显示,EQ中的囊泡状纳米颗粒被双层膜包围,与外泌体相符,类似于UC所观察到的情况。原子力显微镜突出显示了较大的、形状不规则/聚集的EQ纳米颗粒,这与单个圆形的UC纳米颗粒形成对比。ELISA(在0.5ml唾液上进行)显示,EQ中特定外泌体标志物(CD63、CD9、CD81)的表达倾向于高于UC(p>0.05)。针对上皮生长因子受体(一种与外泌体无关的标志物)的ELISA显示,EQ中的浓度明显高于UC(p=0.04)。对总蛋白浓度相等的样本进行蛋白质免疫印迹分析,结果显示两种制剂中均有CD63、CD9和CD81条带,尽管与UC相比,EQ中的条带不太明显。这可能与EQ中非外泌体蛋白的比例较高有关。总之,EQ适用于从小体积唾液中沉淀唾液外泌体且效率较高;然而,与UC相比,EQ往往会伴有更多的生物杂质(与外泌体无关蛋白质/微泡)。