Schurr Avital
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine Louisville, KY, USA.
Front Neurosci. 2014 Nov 19;8:360. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00360. eCollection 2014.
Since its discovery in 1780, lactate (lactic acid) has been blamed for almost any illness outcome in which its levels are elevated. Beginning in the mid-1980s, studies on both muscle and brain tissues, have suggested that lactate plays a role in bioenergetics. However, great skepticism and, at times, outright antagonism has been exhibited by many to any perceived role for this monocarboxylate in energy metabolism. The present review attempts to trace the negative attitudes about lactate to the first four or five decades of research on carbohydrate metabolism and its dogma according to which lactate is a useless anaerobic end-product of glycolysis. The main thrust here is the review of dozens of scientific publications, many by the leading scientists of their times, through the first half of the twentieth century. Consequently, it is concluded that there exists a barrier, described by Howard Margolis as "habit of mind," that many scientists find impossible to cross. The term suggests "entrenched responses that ordinarily occur without conscious attention and that, even if noticed, are hard to change." Habit of mind has undoubtedly played a major role in the above mentioned negative attitudes toward lactate. As early as the 1920s, scientists investigating brain carbohydrate metabolism had discovered that lactate can be oxidized by brain tissue preparations, yet their own habit of mind redirected them to believe that such an oxidation is simply a disposal mechanism of this "poisonous" compound. The last section of the review invites the reader to consider a postulated alternative glycolytic pathway in cerebral and, possibly, in most other tissues, where no distinction is being made between aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis; lactate is always the glycolytic end product. Aerobically, lactate is readily shuttled and transported into the mitochondrion, where it is converted to pyruvate via a mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase (mLDH) and then is entered the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle.
自1780年被发现以来,乳酸(即乳酸)一直被认为与几乎所有其水平升高的疾病结果有关。从20世纪80年代中期开始,对肌肉和脑组织的研究表明,乳酸在生物能量学中发挥作用。然而,许多人对这种一元羧酸在能量代谢中的任何假定作用都表现出极大的怀疑,有时甚至是彻底的反对。本综述试图将对乳酸的负面态度追溯到碳水化合物代谢研究的最初四五十年及其教条,即乳酸是糖酵解无用的无氧终产物。这里的主要内容是回顾20世纪上半叶的几十篇科学出版物,其中许多是当时的顶尖科学家撰写的。因此,得出的结论是,存在一种被霍华德·马戈利斯描述为“思维习惯”的障碍,许多科学家发现难以跨越。这个术语意味着“通常在没有有意识注意的情况下发生的根深蒂固的反应,即使被注意到也很难改变”。思维习惯无疑在上述对乳酸的负面态度中起了主要作用。早在20世纪20年代,研究脑碳水化合物代谢的科学家就发现乳酸可以被脑组织制剂氧化,但他们自己的思维习惯使他们转而认为这种氧化仅仅是这种“有毒”化合物的一种处理机制。综述的最后一部分邀请读者考虑一种假定的替代糖酵解途径,该途径存在于大脑以及可能的大多数其他组织中,在这种途径中,有氧糖酵解和无氧糖酵解没有区别;乳酸始终是糖酵解的终产物。在有氧条件下,乳酸很容易穿梭并转运到线粒体中,在那里它通过线粒体乳酸脱氢酶(mLDH)转化为丙酮酸,然后进入三羧酸(TCA)循环。