Suppr超能文献

EQ-5D-3L量表项目的有效性:对来自六个欧洲国家的2型糖尿病患者的调查。

The validity of the EQ-5D-3L items: an investigation with type 2 diabetes patients from six European countries.

作者信息

Konerding Uwe, Elkhuizen Sylvia G, Faubel Raquel, Forte Paul, Malmström Tomi, Pavi Elpida, Janssen M F Bas

机构信息

Trimberg Research Academy, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, D-96045, Germany.

Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, Rotterdam, DR, 3000, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 5;12:181. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0181-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most previous studies concerning the validity of the EQ-5D-3L items refer to applications of only a single language version of the EQ-5D-3L in only one country. Therefore, there is little information concerning the extent to which the results can be generalised across different language versions and/or different countries. Here the validity of the EQ-5D-3L items is investigated for six different language versions in six different countries.

METHODS

Data came from 1341 type 2 diabetes patients (England: 289; Finland: 177; Germany: 255; Greece: 165; the Netherlands: 354; Spain: 101). The relationships of the five EQ-5D-3L items with seven different test variables (age, gender, education, previous stroke, problems with heart, problems with lower extremities, problems with eyes), were analysed for each combination of item and test variable. For each combination two logistic regression models with the dichotomised EQ-5D-3L item as dependent variable were computed. The first model contained the test variable and dummy coded countries as independent variables, the second model additionally the terms for the interaction between country and test variable. Statistically significant better fit of the second model was taken as evidence for country specific differences regarding the relationship. When such differences could be attributed mainly to one country the analyses were repeated without the data from this country. Validity was investigated with the remaining data using results of the first models.

RESULTS

Due to lack of variation in the Spanish data only 31 of the originally intended 35 interaction tests could be performed. Only three of these yielded a significant result. In all three cases the Spanish data deviated most. Without the Spanish data only 1 of the 35 interaction tests yielded a significant result. With 3 exceptions, the tendency of reporting problems increased with age, female gender, lower education, previous stroke, heart problems, problems with lower extremities and problems with eyes for all EQ-5D-3L items.

CONCLUSION

The results concerning the European Spanish version are ambiguous. However, the items of the English, Finnish, German, Greek and Dutch versions of the EQ-5D-3L relate in substantially the same way to the test variables. Mostly, these relationships indicate the items' validity.

摘要

背景

以往大多数关于EQ-5D-3L项目有效性的研究仅涉及在一个国家应用单一语言版本的EQ-5D-3L。因此,关于结果在不同语言版本和/或不同国家之间能够推广的程度,几乎没有相关信息。在此,对六个不同国家的六种不同语言版本的EQ-5D-3L项目的有效性进行了调查。

方法

数据来自1341名2型糖尿病患者(英格兰:289名;芬兰:177名;德国:255名;希腊:165名;荷兰:354名;西班牙:101名)。针对项目与测试变量的每种组合,分析了五个EQ-5D-3L项目与七个不同测试变量(年龄、性别、教育程度、既往中风、心脏问题、下肢问题、眼部问题)之间的关系。对于每种组合,计算了两个以二分法EQ-5D-3L项目为因变量的逻辑回归模型。第一个模型包含测试变量和虚拟编码的国家作为自变量,第二个模型还包含国家与测试变量之间相互作用的项。第二个模型在统计上具有显著更好的拟合度被视为关于这种关系存在国家特定差异的证据。当这种差异主要可归因于一个国家时,在不包括该国数据的情况下重复进行分析。使用第一个模型的结果,对剩余数据的有效性进行了调查。

结果

由于西班牙数据缺乏变异性,最初计划的35项相互作用测试中仅能进行31项。其中只有三项产生了显著结果。在所有这三种情况下,西班牙数据的偏差最大。不包括西班牙数据时,35项相互作用测试中只有一项产生了显著结果。除了3个例外情况,对于所有EQ-5D-3L项目,报告问题的倾向随着年龄、女性性别、较低教育程度、既往中风、心脏问题、下肢问题和眼部问题而增加。

结论

关于欧洲西班牙语版本的结果不明确。然而,EQ-5D-3L的英语、芬兰语、德语、希腊语和荷兰语版本的项目与测试变量的关系基本相同。大多数情况下,这些关系表明了项目的有效性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review.抑郁症和糖尿病的流行病学:系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Oct;142 Suppl:S8-21. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(12)70004-6.
6
Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China.在中国城市的一般人群样本中验证 EQ-5D。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):155-60. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9915-6. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验