Minarchick Valerie C, Stapleton Phoebe A, Fix Natalie R, Leonard Stephen S, Sabolsky Edward M, Nurkiewicz Timothy R
*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 *Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Toxicol Sci. 2015 Mar;144(1):77-89. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu256. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NP) hold great therapeutic potential, but the in vivo effects of non-pulmonary exposure routes are unclear. The first aim was to determine whether microvascular function is impaired after intravenous and gastric CeO2 NP exposure. The second aim was to investigate the mechanism(s) of action underlying microvascular dysfunction following CeO2 NP exposure. Rats were exposed to CeO2 NP (primary diameter: 4 ± 1 nm, surface area: 81.36 m(2)/g) by intratracheal instillation, intravenous injection, or gastric gavage. Mesenteric arterioles were harvested 24 h post-exposure and vascular function was assessed using an isolated arteriole preparation. Endothelium-dependent and independent function and vascular smooth muscle (VSM) signaling (soluble guanylyl cyclase [sGC] and cyclic guanosine monophosphate [cGMP]) were assessed. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and nitric oxide (NO) production were analyzed. Compared with controls, endothelium-dependent and independent dilation were impaired following intravenous injection (by 61% and 45%) and gastric gavage (by 63% and 49%). However, intravenous injection resulted in greater microvascular impairment (16% and 35%) compared with gastric gavage at an identical dose (100 µg). Furthermore, sGC activation and cGMP responsiveness were impaired following pulmonary, intravenous, and gastric CeO2 NP treatment. Finally, nanoparticle exposure resulted in route-dependent, increased ROS generation and decreased NO production. These results indicate that CeO2 NP exposure route differentially impairs microvascular function, which may be mechanistically linked to decreased NO production and subsequent VSM signaling. Fully understanding the mechanisms behind CeO2 NP in vivo effects is a critical step in the continued therapeutic development of this nanoparticle.
二氧化铈纳米颗粒(CeO2 NP)具有巨大的治疗潜力,但非肺部暴露途径的体内效应尚不清楚。第一个目标是确定静脉内和胃内暴露于CeO2 NP后微血管功能是否受损。第二个目标是研究CeO2 NP暴露后微血管功能障碍的潜在作用机制。通过气管内滴注、静脉注射或胃灌胃将大鼠暴露于CeO2 NP(初级直径:4±1 nm,表面积:81.36 m(2)/g)。暴露后24小时采集肠系膜小动脉,并使用离体小动脉制剂评估血管功能。评估内皮依赖性和非依赖性功能以及血管平滑肌(VSM)信号传导(可溶性鸟苷酸环化酶[sGC]和环磷酸鸟苷[cGMP])。分析活性氧(ROS)生成和一氧化氮(NO)产生。与对照组相比,静脉注射(分别降低61%和45%)和胃灌胃(分别降低63%和49%)后内皮依赖性和非依赖性舒张功能受损。然而,在相同剂量(100 µg)下,静脉注射导致的微血管损伤比胃灌胃更大(分别为16%和35%)。此外,肺部、静脉内和胃内CeO2 NP处理后sGC激活和cGMP反应性受损。最后,纳米颗粒暴露导致ROS生成呈途径依赖性增加,NO产生减少。这些结果表明,CeO2 NP暴露途径对微血管功能的损害存在差异,这可能在机制上与NO产生减少和随后的VSM信号传导有关。全面了解CeO2 NP体内效应背后的机制是该纳米颗粒持续治疗开发的关键一步。