Eluecque H, Nguyen D T, Jankowski R
Service d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, hôpital central, CHU de Nancy, 29, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 54000 Nancy, France.
Service d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, hôpital central, CHU de Nancy, 29, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 54000 Nancy, France; Inserm CIC-EC CIE6, 9, avenue de la Forêt-de-Haye, 54505 Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2015 Feb;132(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2013.07.002. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
The Sniffin' Stick identification subtest, a validated tool to evaluate the sense of smell, is based on the recognition of 16 different odours. The patient is required to choose an answer from among four proposed odours, which introduces the possibility of obtaining random correct answers, especially in patients with an altered sense of smell. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of these random correct answers on interpretation of the simplified version of the Sniffin' Stick test comprising threshold and identification tests in patients with nasal polyposis.
Forty-two consecutive patients with nasal polyposis operated according to the nasalization procedure were enrolled in this prospective study. Odour threshold and identification tests of the Sniffin' Stick kit were performed before and 1 month after surgery. Random correct answers on the identification (I) test (IH) were subtracted from the global number of correct answers (IG) to calculate a real identification score (IR), corresponding to the number of correct answers unrelated to chance.
Two groups of patients were identified: one group with no random correct answers (IH0) (n=17) and another group giving 1 to 7 random correct answers (IH1-7) (n=25). In the IH1-7 group, significantly more patients had an immeasurable threshold (T=0) than a measurable threshold (21 versus 4, P=0.0001). In this subgroup of 21 patients [IH1-7, T=0], the mean IR score was significantly lower than the mean IG score (P<0.0001) and 13 patients were classified as [IR=0; T=0]. Among these 13 patients classified as severe anosmia [IR=0; T=0] preoperatively, only 3 remained severe anosmic [IR=0; T=0] postoperatively.
Random answers to the I identification test were more numerous among patients unable to detect n-Butanol on the T threshold test than among patients able to detect n-butanol. Calculation of the IR identification score allows more precise interpretation of the results of the identification test in patients with severe anosmia.
嗅觉棒识别子测试是一种经过验证的评估嗅觉的工具,基于对16种不同气味的识别。患者需要从四种给出的气味中选择答案,这就存在获得随机正确答案的可能性,尤其是在嗅觉改变的患者中。本研究旨在评估这些随机正确答案对鼻息肉患者嗅觉棒测试简化版(包括阈值和识别测试)结果解读的影响。
42例连续接受鼻腔化手术的鼻息肉患者纳入本前瞻性研究。在手术前和术后1个月进行嗅觉棒套装的气味阈值和识别测试。从正确答案总数(IG)中减去识别(I)测试(IH)中的随机正确答案数量,以计算实际识别分数(IR),即与随机因素无关的正确答案数量。
确定了两组患者:一组无随机正确答案(IH0)(n = 17),另一组有1至7个随机正确答案(IH1 - 7)(n = 25)。在IH1 - 7组中,阈值不可测量(T = 0)的患者明显多于阈值可测量的患者(21例对4例,P = 0.0001)。在这21例患者的亚组[IH1 - 7,T = 0]中,平均IR分数显著低于平均IG分数(P < 0.0001),且13例患者被归类为[IR = 0;T = 0]。在术前被归类为重度嗅觉减退[IR = 0;T = 0]的这13例患者中,术后仅3例仍为重度嗅觉减退[IR = 0;T = 0]。
在阈值测试中无法检测到正丁醇的患者中,识别(I)测试的随机答案比能够检测到正丁醇的患者更多。计算IR识别分数可更精确地解读重度嗅觉减退患者识别测试的结果。