Suppr超能文献

二十年的结构构建

Two Decades of Structure Building.

作者信息

Gernsbacher Morton Ann

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Discourse Process. 1997 Jan;23(3):265-304. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544994.

Abstract

During the past decade I have been developing a very simple framework for describing the cognitive processes and mechanisms involved in discourse comprehension. I call this framework the Structure Building Framework, and it is based on evidence provided during the first decade of discourse processing research. According to the Structure Building Framework, the goal of comprehension is to build coherent mental representations or . Comprehenders build each structure by first laying a foundation. Comprehenders develop mental structures by mapping on new information when that information coheres or relates to previous information. However, when the incoming information is less related, comprehenders shift and attach a new substructure. The building blocks of mental structures are memory nodes, which are activated by incoming stimuli and controlled by two cognitive mechanisms: suppression and enhancement. In this article, first I review the seminal work on which the Structure Building Framework is based (the first decade of structure building research); then I recount the research I have conducted to test the Structure Building Framework (the second decade of structure building research).

摘要

在过去十年里,我一直在开发一个非常简单的框架,用于描述语篇理解中涉及的认知过程和机制。我将这个框架称为结构构建框架,它基于语篇处理研究第一个十年期间所提供的证据。根据结构构建框架,理解的目标是构建连贯的心理表征。理解者首先通过奠定基础来构建每个结构。当新信息与先前信息连贯或相关时,理解者通过映射新信息来发展心理结构。然而,当传入信息相关性较小时,理解者会转移并附加一个新的子结构。心理结构的构建块是记忆节点,这些节点由传入刺激激活,并由两种认知机制控制:抑制和增强。在本文中,首先我回顾了结构构建框架所基于的开创性工作(结构构建研究的第一个十年);然后我讲述了我为测试结构构建框架而进行的研究(结构构建研究的第二个十年)。

相似文献

1
Two Decades of Structure Building.
Discourse Process. 1997 Jan;23(3):265-304. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544994.
2
Disordered discourse in schizophrenia described by the Structure Building Framework.
Discourse Stud. 1999 Aug;1(3):355-372. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001003004.
5
Coarse coding and discourse comprehension in adults with right hemisphere brain damage.
Aphasiology. 2008 Feb 1;22(2):204-223. doi: 10.1080/02687030601125019.
6
Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension: a human lesion study.
Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):277-87. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt312. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
8
Intersentential coreference expectations reflect mental models of events.
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Contribution of Working Memory and Inferencing to Narrative Discourse Comprehension and Production in Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jul 12;66(7):2346-2361. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00632. Epub 2023 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The neural basis of event segmentation: Stable features in the environment are reflected by neural states.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 15;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00432. eCollection 2025.
4
Some Contributions from Embodied Cognition to Psychonarratology.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Nov 15;53(6):74. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10110-8.
7
Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2092-2101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Events shape long-term memory for story information.
Discourse Process. 2023;60(2):141-161. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2023.2185408. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Making and revising predictive inferences during Chinese narrative text reading: Evidence from an electrophysiological study.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1061725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061725. eCollection 2022.
10
Situation updating during discourse comprehension recruits right posterior portion of the multiple-demand network.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Apr 15;44(6):2129-2141. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26198. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension.
J Mem Lang. 1996 Aug;35(4):517-543. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0028.
2
IN SEARCH OF GENDER NEUTRALITY: Is Singular a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic ?
Psychol Sci. 1997 Mar;8(2):106-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00691.x.
3
Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.
J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.
4
Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.
Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):353-371. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409391.
5
How Natural are Conceptual Anaphors?
Lang Cogn Process. 1992 Aug;7(3-4):257-280. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409387.
6
Improving Written Communication Through Minimal Feedback.
Lang Cogn Process. 1992 Feb;7(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409378.
7
Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehension.
Discourse Process. 1995 Mar;19(2):173-199. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544913.
8
In Search of Complete Comprehension: Getting "Minimalists" to Work.
Discourse Process. 1994 Nov;18(3):271-296. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544896.
10
Comprehending Conceptual Anaphors in Spanish.
Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):281-299. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409388.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验