Suppr超能文献

在呈现虚构人物的情感状态时知识激活与句子映射的比较

Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.

作者信息

Gernsbacher Morton Ann, Robertson Rachel R W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, U.S.A.

出版信息

Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):353-371. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409391.

Abstract

We investigated the role that knowledge activation and sentence mapping play in how readers represent fictional characters' emotional states. The subjects read stories that described concrete actions, such as a main character stealing money from a store where his best friend worked and later learning that his friend had been fired. By manipulating the content of the stories (i.e. writing stories that implied different emotional states), we affected what emotional knowledge would be activated. Following each story, the subjects read a target sentence that contained an emotion word. By manipulating the emotion word in each target sentence (i.e. whether it matched mismatched the emotional state implied by the story), we affected how easily subjects could map the target sentence onto their developing mental structures. In Experiment 1, we further isolated the role of knowledge activation from the role of sentence mapping with a density manipulation. When the subjects read many emotional stories, they more widely activated their knowledge of emotional states. Using a proportionality manipulation in Experiment 2, we demonstrated that this result was not due to the subjects' strategies.

摘要

我们研究了知识激活和句子映射在读者如何表征虚构人物的情绪状态中所起的作用。受试者阅读描述具体行为的故事,比如一个主角从他最好的朋友工作的商店偷钱,后来得知他的朋友被解雇了。通过操纵故事的内容(即编写暗示不同情绪状态的故事),我们影响了哪些情绪知识会被激活。读完每个故事后,受试者阅读一个包含情绪词的目标句子。通过操纵每个目标句子中的情绪词(即它是否与故事所暗示的情绪状态相匹配或不匹配),我们影响了受试者将目标句子映射到其正在形成的心理结构上的难易程度。在实验1中,我们通过密度操纵进一步分离了知识激活的作用与句子映射的作用。当受试者阅读许多情感故事时,他们更广泛地激活了自己的情绪状态知识。在实验2中,我们使用比例操纵证明了这一结果并非由于受试者的策略。

相似文献

6
How readers experience characters' decisions.读者如何体验角色的决策。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):753-61. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.753.
9
Surviving with story characters: What do we remember?与故事角色共存:我们会记住什么?
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1303-1316. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01391-2. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

3
Two Decades of Structure Building.二十年的结构构建
Discourse Process. 1997 Jan;23(3):265-304. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544994.
4
The functional role of the periphery in emotional language comprehension.情绪语言理解中外周的功能作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 27;4:294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00294. eCollection 2013.
5
Event perception.事件感知
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):608-620. doi: 10.1002/wcs.133. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
9
Cataphoric devices in spoken discourse.口语语篇中的前指手段。
Cogn Psychol. 1995 Aug;29(1):24-58. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1011.

本文引用的文献

3
The mental representation of spatial descriptions.空间描述的心理表征。
Mem Cognit. 1982 Mar;10(2):181-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03209220.
10
Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jul;14(3):410-20. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.410.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验