Chuang Emmeline, Collins-Camargo Crystal, McBeath Bowen
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr. South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA.
Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, 2217 S. Third Street, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 8;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0580-1.
Challenges to evidence use are well documented. Less well understood are the formal supports-e.g., technical infrastructure, inter-organizational relationships-organizations may put in place to help overcome these challenges. This study will identify supports for evidence use currently used by private child and family serving agencies delivering publicly funded behavioral health and/or human services; examine contextual, organizational, and managerial factors associated with use of such supports; and determine how identified supports affect evidence use by staff at multiple levels of the organization.
We will use a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, with study activities occurring in two sequential phases: In phase 1, quantitative survey data collected from managers of private child and family serving agencies in six states (CA, IN, KY, MO, PA, and WI) and analyzed using both regression and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) will identify organizational supports currently being used to facilitate evidence use and examine the contextual, organizational, and managerial factors associated with the use of such supports. In phase 2, data from phase 1 will be used to select a purposive sample of 12 agencies for in-depth case studies. In those 12 agencies, semi-structured interviews with key informants and managers, focus groups with frontline staff, and document analysis will provide further insight into agencies' motivation for investing in organizational supports for evidence use and the facilitators and barriers encountered in doing so. Semi-structured interviews with managers and focus groups with frontline staff will also assess whether and how identified supports affect evidence use at different levels of the organization (senior executives, middle managers, frontline supervisors, and frontline staff). Within- and between-case analyses supplemented by QCA will identify combinations of factors associated with the highest and lowest levels of staff evidence use.
This study will inform efforts to improve sustainment, scale-up, and spread of evidence by providing insight into organizational and managerial strategies that facilitate evidence use, the contexts in which these strategies are most effective, and their effect on evidence use by staff at different levels of the organization.
证据应用面临的挑战已有充分记载。但人们对组织为帮助克服这些挑战而建立的正式支持措施(如技术基础设施、组织间关系)了解较少。本研究将确定提供公共资金支持的行为健康和/或人类服务的私立儿童及家庭服务机构当前使用的证据应用支持措施;研究与使用此类支持措施相关的背景、组织和管理因素;并确定所确定的支持措施如何影响组织多个层面工作人员的证据应用。
我们将采用顺序解释性混合方法设计,研究活动分两个连续阶段进行:在第1阶段,从六个州(加利福尼亚州、印第安纳州、肯塔基州、密苏里州、宾夕法尼亚州和威斯康星州)的私立儿童及家庭服务机构经理处收集定量调查数据,并使用回归分析和定性比较分析(QCA)进行分析,以确定当前用于促进证据应用的组织支持措施,并研究与使用此类支持措施相关的背景、组织和管理因素。在第2阶段,第1阶段的数据将用于选择12个机构进行深入案例研究。在这12个机构中,对关键信息提供者和经理进行半结构化访谈、与一线工作人员进行焦点小组讨论以及文件分析,将进一步深入了解机构投资于证据应用组织支持措施的动机以及这样做时遇到的促进因素和障碍。对经理进行的半结构化访谈和与一线工作人员进行的焦点小组讨论还将评估所确定的支持措施是否以及如何影响组织不同层面(高级管理人员、中层管理人员、一线主管和一线工作人员)的证据应用。通过QCA补充的案例内和案例间分析将确定与工作人员证据应用最高和最低水平相关的因素组合。
本研究将通过深入了解促进证据应用的组织和管理策略、这些策略最有效的背景以及它们对组织不同层面工作人员证据应用的影响,为改善证据的持续应用、扩大规模和推广提供信息。