• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于使用Tryton专用分叉支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结果的首次报告。

First report on long-term clinical results after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with the Tryton dedicated bifurcation stent.

作者信息

Grundeken Maik J, Kraak Robin P, Baan Jan, Arkenbout E Karin, Piek Jan J, Vis M Marije, Henriques Jose P S, Koch Karel T, Tijssen Jan G P, de Winter Robbert J, Wykrzykowska Joanna J

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 1;84(5):759-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25350.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.25350
PMID:25485348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions of coronary bifurcation lesions, the Tryton Side Branch Stent™ (Tryton Medical, Durham) was developed. Registry studies evaluating the Tryton stent has shown promisingclinical results and the stent is currently compared with the provisional single stent strategy in a randomized trial. However, clinical results beyond one year are lacking, and therefore, we investigated the one- and two-year outcomes after Tryton stent placement in a single-center registry study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients in our center in whom Tryton placement was attempted between October 2010 and December 2011 were included. Clinical outcomes were defined as cardiac death, any myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), and target vessel failure (TVF; composite of cardiac death, MI, and TVR). Event rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We included 91 patients. Almost half (42%) of the patients included had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as indication for PCI (12% unstable angina, 14% NSTEMI, and 16% STEMI). Median follow-up duration was 713 days (IQR 617-840). TVF rates were 14.5% (one year) and 20.3% (two year). Two-year cardiac death, MI, TVR, TLR and ST rates were 4.4%, 10.2%, 12.7%, 9.2%, and 2.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center registry, use of the Tryton stent was associated with acceptable clinical outcomes at two-year follow-up.

摘要

背景

为改善冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床疗效,研发了Tryton边支支架™(Tryton Medical公司,达勒姆)。评估Tryton支架的注册研究已显示出有前景的临床结果,且该支架目前正在一项随机试验中与临时单支架策略进行比较。然而,缺乏一年以上的临床结果,因此,我们在一项单中心注册研究中调查了Tryton支架置入术后1年和2年的结局。

方法和结果

纳入2010年10月至2011年12月期间在本中心尝试置入Tryton支架的所有患者。临床结局定义为心源性死亡、任何心肌梗死(MI)、靶血管血运重建(TVR)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)、支架血栓形成(ST)和靶血管失败(TVF;心源性死亡、MI和TVR的复合终点)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计事件发生率。我们纳入了91例患者。纳入患者中近一半(42%)以急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)作为PCI的适应证(12%为不稳定型心绞痛,14%为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死,16%为ST段抬高型心肌梗死)。中位随访时间为713天(四分位间距617 - 840天)。TVF发生率为14.5%(1年)和20.3%(2年)。2年的心源性死亡、MI、TVR、TLR和ST发生率分别为4.4%、10.2%、12.7%、9.2%和2.2%。

结论

在这项单中心注册研究中,Tryton支架的使用在2年随访时具有可接受的临床结局。

相似文献

1
First report on long-term clinical results after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with the Tryton dedicated bifurcation stent.关于使用Tryton专用分叉支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结果的首次报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 1;84(5):759-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25350.
2
Outcomes of a dedicated stent in coronary bifurcations with large side branches: A subanalysis of the randomized TRYTON bifurcation study.用于有大分支的冠状动脉分叉病变的专用支架的疗效:随机TRYTON分叉病变研究的亚组分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):1231-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26240. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Six-month clinical follow-up of the Tryton side branch stent for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: a two center registry analysis.Tryton 分支支架治疗分叉病变的 6 个月临床随访:一项两中心注册研究分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):798-806. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22767. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
4
A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变治疗中专用分叉支架与预扩张支架的随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.
5
Six-month clinical outcomes of the Tryton Side Branch Stent for the treatment of bifurcation lesions.治疗分叉病变的 Tryton 分支支架的 6 个月临床结果。
Neth Heart J. 2012 Nov;20(11):439-46. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0302-x.
6
Gender differences in patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent at a tertiary medical center.在一家三级医疗中心接受佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者中的性别差异。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jun;24(6):256-60.
7
Placement of Tryton Side Branch Stent only; a new treatment strategy for Medina 0,0,1 coronary bifurcation lesions.仅放置 Tryton 侧支支架;一种治疗 Medina 0,0,1 冠状动脉分叉病变的新策略。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E395-402. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24811. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
8
Healing responses after bifurcation stenting with the dedicated TRYTON Side-Branch Stent™ in combination with XIENCE-V™ stents: a clinical, angiography, fractional flow reserve, and optical coherence tomography study: the PYTON (Prospective evaluation of the TRYTON Side-Branch Stent™ with an additional XIENCE-v™ everolimus-eluting stent in coronary bifurcation lesions) study.采用专用 TRYTON 分支支架™联合 XIENCE-V™支架治疗分叉病变后的愈合反应:一项临床、血管造影、血流储备分数和光学相干断层成像研究:PYTON(前瞻性评价 TRYTON 分支支架™与冠状动脉分叉病变中额外的 XIENCE-v™依维莫司洗脱支架的疗效)研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(3):E155-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24536. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
9
Safety and efficacy of the Tryton Side Branch Stent™ for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: an update.Tryton 分支支架™治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和有效性:最新进展
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Jul;14(7):545-555. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1338135. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Six-month and one-year clinical outcomes after placement of a dedicated coronary bifurcation stent: a patient-level pooled analysis of eight registry studies.专用冠状动脉分叉支架置入术后 6 个月和 1 年的临床结果:8 项注册研究的患者水平汇总分析。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jun 22;9(2):195-203. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I2A34.

引用本文的文献

1
The Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled POLBOS 3 Trial Comparing Regular Drug-Eluting Stents and the Sirolimus-Eluting BiOSS LIM C Dedicated Coronary Bifurcation Stent: Four-Year Results.比较普通药物洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱BiOSS LIM C专用冠状动脉分叉支架的随机、多中心、开放标签、对照POLBOS 3试验:四年结果
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):938. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050938.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生物可吸收血管支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(6):e280422204203. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220428115520.