• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[脑电图与内源性抑郁症治疗效果的相关性及可能的预测因素]

[EEG-correlates and possible predictors of efficacy of treatment of endogenous depression].

作者信息

Iznak A F, Tiganov A S, Iznak E V, Sorokin S A

出版信息

Fiziol Cheloveka. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):49-57.

PMID:25486830
Abstract

An analysis of EEG spectral power values and of quantitative clinical scores of depressive conditions has been carried out in dynamics of treatment in 40 patients with endogenous depression with the main goal to study neurophysiologic correlates and to search possible predictors of therapeutic outcome. The reduction of depressive symptoms by the end of the treatment course was associated with EEG signs of improvement of brain functional state. Significant correlations have been revealed between the EEG narrow-band spectral power values and clinical scores. As well, significant correlations have been revealed between some initial (before beginning of treatment) EEG parameters and quantitative clinical scores at the stage of remission establishing. The values of EEG beta-1 and beta-2 spectral power appeared to be such predictors, while initially larger values of EEG beta activity spectral power were associated with higher pronounce of residual depressive symptoms after the treatment course. The data obtained allow to justify basic views on brain mechanisms of various aspects of depressive disorders, and to reveal possible neurophysiological predictors of efficacy of treatment of endogenous depression.

摘要

对40例内源性抑郁症患者治疗过程中的脑电图频谱功率值和抑郁状况的定量临床评分进行了动态分析,主要目的是研究神经生理相关性并寻找治疗结果的可能预测指标。治疗疗程结束时抑郁症状的减轻与脑功能状态改善的脑电图征象相关。脑电图窄带频谱功率值与临床评分之间存在显著相关性。此外,在缓解期建立阶段,一些初始(治疗开始前)脑电图参数与定量临床评分之间也存在显著相关性。脑电图β-1和β-2频谱功率值似乎就是这样的预测指标,而最初较大的脑电图β活动频谱功率值与治疗疗程后残留抑郁症状的较高程度相关。所获得的数据有助于证明关于抑郁症各方面脑机制的基本观点,并揭示内源性抑郁症治疗效果的可能神经生理预测指标。

相似文献

1
[EEG-correlates and possible predictors of efficacy of treatment of endogenous depression].[脑电图与内源性抑郁症治疗效果的相关性及可能的预测因素]
Fiziol Cheloveka. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):49-57.
2
[EEG-correlates of frontal dysfunction as predictors of relative pharmacoresistance in treatment of endogenous affective disorders].[脑电图与额叶功能障碍的相关性作为内源性情感障碍治疗中相对药物抵抗性的预测指标]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(12):54-59. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201411412154-59.
3
[Auditory event-related evoked potentials in dynamics of treatment of affective-delusional conditions].[情感妄想状态治疗动态中的听觉事件相关诱发电位]
Fiziol Cheloveka. 2014 Nov-Dec;40(6):75-87.
4
[Changes in EEG and reaction time in the treatment of apathic depression].[淡漠型抑郁症治疗中脑电图及反应时间的变化]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2011;111(7):49-53.
5
EEG mapping in patients with social phobia.社交恐惧症患者的脑电图图谱
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Sep 15;131(3):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2003.08.007.
6
[Quantitative EEG characteristics of the state of depressive phase and the state of remission in major depression].[重度抑郁症抑郁发作期与缓解期的定量脑电图特征]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1996;98(6):363-77.
7
Spectral features of EEG in depression.抑郁症患者脑电图的频谱特征。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2010 Jun;55(3):155-61. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2010.011.
8
Neurophysiological correlates of depressive symptoms in young adults: A quantitative EEG study.青年成人抑郁症状的神经生理相关性:一项定量脑电图研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jan;47:315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.030. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
9
Music therapy modulates fronto-temporal activity in rest-EEG in depressed clients.音乐疗法调节抑郁患者静息态 EEG 的额颞叶活动。
Brain Topogr. 2013 Apr;26(2):338-54. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0254-x. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
10
[The relationship between quantitative clinical and EEG parameters in the treatment of delusional conditions in patients with attack-like schizophrenia].[发作样精神分裂症患者妄想状态治疗中定量临床参数与脑电图参数之间的关系]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2016;116(2):80-84. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20161162180-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline Difference in Quantitative Electroencephalography Variables Between Responders and Non-Responders to Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression.抑郁症患者中低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗反应者与无反应者之间定量脑电图变量的基线差异
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 27;11:83. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00083. eCollection 2020.