Suppr超能文献

肩关节置换术后的功能性内旋:解剖型与反式肩关节置换的比较

Functional internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

作者信息

Triplet Jacob J, Everding Nathan G, Levy Jonathan C, Moor Molly A

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recovery of functional internal rotation after primary shoulder arthroplasty is essential to perform many important activities of daily living. Functional internal rotation is typically reported as it relates to clinical examination findings of motion (posterior reach) and lift-off or belly-press tests. A more detailed evaluation of functional recovery of internal rotation after primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is needed.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated with primary TSA (n = 132) and RSA (n = 91) with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Subanalysis of revision RSA (n = 24) and primary RSA was performed. Active range of motion, subjective internal rotation motion, manual internal rotation strength, and specific questions related to internal rotation function isolated from the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) functional questionnaires were reviewed.

RESULTS

Compared with RSA, TSA patients could more likely reach the small of the back (SST) and wash the back/fasten bra (ASES). Active internal rotation motion, SST score, ASES score, and subjective internal rotation were greater after TSA. No significant difference was observed with respect to managing toileting between cohorts. Revision RSA patients were less likely to be able to wash the back/fasten bra (ASES) and easily manage toileting (ASES) compared with primary RSA patients.

CONCLUSION

Primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty yields greater functional internal rotation than does primary RSA, with either procedure being effective at managing toileting. Patient education regarding activities of daily living related to internal rotation can be predicted.

摘要

背景

初次肩关节置换术后功能性内旋的恢复对于进行许多重要的日常生活活动至关重要。功能性内旋通常根据与运动的临床检查结果(后伸)以及抬离或腹部按压试验的关系来报告。需要对初次解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)和反肩关节置换术(RSA)后内旋功能恢复进行更详细的评估。

方法

对接受初次TSA(n = 132)和RSA(n = 91)治疗且随访至少2年的患者进行回顾性研究。对翻修RSA(n = 24)和初次RSA进行亚分析。回顾了主动活动范围、主观内旋活动、手动内旋力量,以及从简单肩关节测试(SST)和美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)功能问卷中分离出的与内旋功能相关的特定问题。

结果

与RSA相比,TSA患者更有可能触及背部下方(SST)以及清洗背部/系上胸罩(ASES)。TSA后的主动内旋活动、SST评分、ASES评分和主观内旋更大。两组在处理如厕方面未观察到显著差异。与初次RSA患者相比,翻修RSA患者清洗背部/系上胸罩(ASES)以及轻松处理如厕(ASES)的可能性较小。

结论

初次解剖型肩关节置换术比初次RSA产生更大的功能性内旋,两种手术在处理如厕方面均有效。可以对患者进行与内旋相关的日常生活活动教育。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验