• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

55岁以下患者的反肩关节置换术:2至12年随访

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: 2- to 12-year follow-up.

作者信息

Otto Randall J, Clark Rachel E, Frankle Mark A

机构信息

Shoulder and Elbow Service, Premier Care Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Clinical Research, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.051. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.051
PMID:28034540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study reports the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients younger than 55 years with midterm to long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients (average age, 47.9 years; range, 21-54 years) were identified who underwent RSA with an average 62.3 months of follow-up (24-144 months). There were 35 patients (group 1) who had a failed arthroplasty and 32 patients (group 2) who underwent primary RSA. Clinical outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and range of motion. Complications included radiographic failures (fracture, dislocation, notching, loosening), infections, and nerve palsies.

RESULTS

Group 1 showed significant improvements in flexion and abduction but not in external or internal rotation. Group 2 showed significant improvements in flexion, abduction, and internal rotation but not in external rotation. Both groups showed significant improvements in ASES and SST scores. In group 1, ASES score improved from 24.4 to 40.8 (P = .003), and SST score improved from 1.3 to 3.2 (P = .043). In group 2, ASES score improved from 28.1 to 58.6 (P < .001), and SST score improved from 1.3 to 4.5 (P = .004). The total complication rate was 22.4%. The total reoperation rate was 13.4%, and the revision rate was 8.9%. The implant retention rate was 91% at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RSA in patients younger than 55 years provides significant clinical improvements with high implant retention at up to 12 years. Patients undergoing revision RSA begin with worse function than those undergoing primary RSA, but they can expect similar degrees of improvement. Complications were higher but reoperation rates were lower in the revision group. No mechanical failures occurred in the primary group, with infection the cause of all revisions.

摘要

背景

本研究报告了年龄小于55岁患者行反式肩关节置换术(RSA)的中期至长期随访结果。

方法

确定67例患者(平均年龄47.9岁;范围21 - 54岁),他们接受了RSA,平均随访62.3个月(24 - 144个月)。其中35例患者(第1组)关节置换失败,32例患者(第2组)接受初次RSA。临床结果包括美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、简易肩关节测试(SST)评分和活动范围。并发症包括影像学失败(骨折、脱位、切迹、松动)、感染和神经麻痹。

结果

第1组在屈曲和外展方面有显著改善,但在外旋或内旋方面无改善。第2组在屈曲、外展和内旋方面有显著改善,但在外旋方面无改善。两组的ASES和SST评分均有显著改善。在第1组中,ASES评分从24.4提高到40.8(P = 0.003),SST评分从1.3提高到3.2(P = 0.043)。在第2组中,ASES评分从28.1提高到58.6(P < 0.001),SST评分从1.3提高到4.5(P = 0.004)。总并发症发生率为22.4%。总再次手术率为13.4%,翻修率为8.9%。最后一次随访时植入物保留率为91%。

结论

年龄小于55岁患者行RSA可带来显著的临床改善,植入物保留率高,长达12年。接受翻修RSA的患者初始功能比接受初次RSA的患者差,但他们有望获得相似程度的改善。翻修组并发症较高,但再次手术率较低。初次手术组未发生机械性失败,所有翻修均因感染所致。

相似文献

1
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: 2- to 12-year follow-up.55岁以下患者的反肩关节置换术:2至12年随访
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.051. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Revision to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Restores Stability for Patients With Unstable Shoulder Prostheses.反向全肩关节置换术的翻修恢复了不稳定肩关节假体患者的稳定性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2716-2722. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5429-z. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
3
Can a reverse shoulder arthroplasty be used to revise a failed primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for failed reverse prosthesis.反式肩关节置换术可否用于翻修初次失败的反式肩关节置换术?:翻修失败的反式假体的反式肩关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1493-1498. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0226.R2.
4
Functional internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后的功能性内旋:解剖型与反式肩关节置换的比较
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 70 years of age and older: a comparison cohort at early to midterm follow-up.70 岁及以上患者的解剖型和反式肩关节置换术:早期至中期随访的比较队列研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1336-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Revision for instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and risk factors for failure.反式全肩关节置换术后不稳定的翻修:失败的结果和风险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6S):S46-S52. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.023. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
Do younger patients have better results after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?年轻患者行反式全肩关节置换术后的效果更好吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S24-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Revision for a failed reverse: a 12-year review of a lateralized implant.失败翻修术:对侧植入物的12年回顾
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):e115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with high side reaming versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for eccentric glenoid wear patterns with an intact rotator cuff: comparing early versus midterm outcomes with minimum 7 years of follow-up.对于肩袖完整但存在偏心盂磨损模式的患者,高侧扩髓解剖型肩关节置换术与反肩关节置换术的比较:至少7年随访的早期与中期结果对比
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):972-979. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.017. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
Defining the younger patient: age as a predictive factor for outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty.定义年轻患者:年龄是肩关节置换术结果的预测因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S1-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.016. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in elderly patients.老年患者全肩关节置换翻修术的疗效
JSES Int. 2025 Feb 6;9(3):815-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.01.006. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Shoulder replacement in the under 55's is anatomical or reverse the best solution?55岁以下人群的肩关节置换,解剖型或反置型哪种是最佳解决方案?
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Jun 2;10(6):396-402. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2025-0052.
3
Lower trapezius tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears improves outcomes in patients with high grade fatty infiltration of teres minor.
下斜方肌腱转位术治疗巨大不可修复性肩袖撕裂可改善小圆肌严重脂肪浸润患者的预后。
JSES Int. 2024 Dec 4;9(1):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.014. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.确定翻修反肩关节置换术的临界点。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul 23:17585732241263753. doi: 10.1177/17585732241263753.
5
Recent Advances in the Design and Application of Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Systems and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review.肩关节置换植入系统的设计与应用的最新进展及其对临床结果的影响:一项综述
Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Jul 26;16:205-220. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S312870. eCollection 2024.
6
Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tear: a review of current methods.不可修复性肩袖撕裂的上盂唇重建:当前方法综述
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Dec;26(4):438-444. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00514. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years old: Results from the New Zealand joint registry.55岁以下患者行反肩关节置换术的疗效:来自新西兰关节登记处的结果。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Nov;15(3 Suppl):69-74. doi: 10.1177/17585732221104745. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
8
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old Exhibit Lower Clinically Significant Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores Compared to Older Patients.与老年患者相比,60岁以下的反肩关节置换术患者在具有临床意义的单项评估数值评定(SANE)评分方面较低。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46492. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Shoulder joint arthroplasty in young patients: Analysis of 8742 patients from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.年轻患者的肩关节置换术:来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的8742例患者分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Sep;15(1 Suppl):41-52. doi: 10.1177/17585732211058717. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
Proximal humerus fracture management and outcomes are distinctly different for individuals 60 years of age or younger: a systematic review.60岁及以下个体的肱骨近端骨折治疗与预后明显不同:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Feb 1;3(2):142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.01.002. eCollection 2023 May.