• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺腺癌蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络的差异:一项回顾性研究。

Differences in protein-protein association networks for lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Datta Anisha, Sikdar Sinjini, Gill Ryan

机构信息

Louisville Collegiate School and Department of Mathematics, University of Louisville.

Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville.

出版信息

Bioinformation. 2014 Oct 30;10(10):647-51. doi: 10.6026/97320630010647. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.6026/97320630010647
PMID:25489174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4248347/
Abstract

Various methods to determine the connectivity scores between groups of proteins associated with lung adenocarcinoma are examined. Proteins act together to perform a wide range of functions within biological processes. Hence, identification of key proteins and their interactions within protein networks can provide invaluable information on disease mechanisms. Differential network analysis provides a means of identifying differences in the interactions among proteins between two networks. We use connectivity scores based on the method of partial least squares to quantify the strength of the interactions between each pair of proteins. These scores are then used to perform permutation-based statistical tests. This examines if there are significant differences between the network connectivity scores for individual proteins or classes of proteins. The expression data from a study on lung adenocarcinoma is used in this study. Connectivity scores are computed for a group of 109 subjects who were in the complete remission and as well as for a group of 51 subjects whose cancer had progressed. The distributions of the connectivity scores are similar for the two networks yet subtle but statistically significant differences have been identified and their impact discussed.

摘要

研究了多种确定与肺腺癌相关的蛋白质组之间连接性得分的方法。蛋白质共同作用以在生物过程中执行广泛的功能。因此,识别关键蛋白质及其在蛋白质网络中的相互作用可以提供有关疾病机制的宝贵信息。差异网络分析提供了一种识别两个网络之间蛋白质相互作用差异的方法。我们使用基于偏最小二乘法的连接性得分来量化每对蛋白质之间相互作用的强度。然后使用这些得分进行基于排列的统计检验。这检查了单个蛋白质或蛋白质类别在网络连接性得分之间是否存在显著差异。本研究使用了一项关于肺腺癌的研究中的表达数据。为一组处于完全缓解状态的109名受试者以及一组癌症已进展的51名受试者计算连接性得分。两个网络的连接性得分分布相似,但已识别出细微但具有统计学意义的差异并讨论了其影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5afa/4248347/420b83f61b30/97320630010647F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5afa/4248347/9aa0bdb2194c/97320630010647F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5afa/4248347/420b83f61b30/97320630010647F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5afa/4248347/9aa0bdb2194c/97320630010647F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5afa/4248347/420b83f61b30/97320630010647F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in protein-protein association networks for lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study.肺腺癌蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络的差异:一项回顾性研究。
Bioinformation. 2014 Oct 30;10(10):647-51. doi: 10.6026/97320630010647. eCollection 2014.
2
Differential co-expression network centrality and machine learning feature selection for identifying susceptibility hubs in networks with scale-free structure.具有无标度结构网络中易感性枢纽的鉴别:差异共表达网络中心性和机器学习特征选择。
BioData Min. 2015 Feb 3;8:5. doi: 10.1186/s13040-015-0040-x. eCollection 2015.
3
Large-scale network functional interactions during distraction and reappraisal in remitted bipolar and unipolar patients.缓解期双相和单相情感障碍患者在分心和重新评价时的大规模网络功能交互作用。
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Sep;19(6):487-495. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12512. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Selectively and progressively disrupted structural connectivity of functional brain networks in Alzheimer's disease - revealed by a novel framework to analyze edge distributions of networks detecting disruptions with strong statistical evidence.阿尔茨海默病患者功能性脑网络的结构连接选择性和渐进性中断 - 通过一种新的分析网络边缘分布的框架来揭示,该框架可用于检测具有强统计证据的中断。
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 11.
5
On predicting regulatory genes by analysis of functional networks in C. elegans.通过分析秀丽隐杆线虫功能网络预测调控基因
BioData Min. 2015 Nov 2;8:33. doi: 10.1186/s13040-015-0066-0. eCollection 2015.
6
Connectivity Between Brain Networks Dynamically Reflects Cognitive Status of Parkinson's Disease: A Longitudinal Study.脑网络连接的动态变化反映帕金森病的认知状态:一项纵向研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(3):971-984. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180834.
7
Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification.用于早期轻度认知障碍识别的稀疏时间动态静息态功能连接网络。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Jun;10(2):342-56. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9408-2.
8
Thalamocortical functional connectivity in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is abnormally enhanced in executive-control and default-mode networks.在Lennox-Gastaut综合征中,丘脑皮质功能连接在执行控制网络和默认模式网络中异常增强。
Epilepsia. 2017 Dec;58(12):2085-2097. doi: 10.1111/epi.13932. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
Altered Granger Causal Connectivity of Resting-State Neural Networks in Patients With Leukoaraiosis-Associated Cognitive Impairment-A Cross-Sectional Study.白质疏松症相关认知障碍患者静息态神经网络的格兰杰因果连接改变——一项横断面研究
Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 10;11:457. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.
10
Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.动态功能连接塑造了联想学习中的个体差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3911-3928. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23285.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-level proteomic network prediction by explainable artificial intelligence.通过可解释人工智能进行患者水平的蛋白质组学网络预测。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Jun 7;6(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00278-4.

本文引用的文献

1
dna: An R package for differential network analysis.DNA:用于差异网络分析的R软件包。
Bioinformation. 2014 Apr 23;10(4):233-4. doi: 10.6026/97320630010233. eCollection 2014.
2
ADAM9 up-regulates N-cadherin via miR-218 suppression in lung adenocarcinoma cells.在肺腺癌细胞中,ADAM9通过抑制miR-218上调N-钙黏蛋白。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 4;9(4):e94065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094065. eCollection 2014.
3
Tumor-propagating cells and Yap/Taz activity contribute to lung tumor progression and metastasis.肿瘤增殖细胞和 Yap/Taz 活性促进肺肿瘤的进展和转移。
EMBO J. 2014 Mar 3;33(5):468-81. doi: 10.1002/embj.201386082. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
4
PTEN is a potent suppressor of small cell lung cancer.PTEN是小细胞肺癌的一种强效抑制因子。
Mol Cancer Res. 2014 May;12(5):654-9. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0554. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.肺腺癌中的表皮生长因子受体突变。
Lab Invest. 2014 Feb;94(2):129-37. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2013.147. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
New approaches of PARP-1 inhibitors in human lung cancer cells and cancer stem-like cells by some selected anthraquinone-derived small molecules.某些蒽醌衍生的小分子通过 PARP-1 抑制剂在人类肺癌细胞和癌症干细胞样细胞中的新方法。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056284. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
7
The genomics of lung adenocarcinoma: opportunities for targeted therapies.肺腺癌的基因组学:靶向治疗的机遇
Genes Cancer. 2010 Dec;1(12):1200-10. doi: 10.1177/1947601911407324.
8
Insulin receptor substrate regulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase.胰岛素受体底物对磷酸肌醇 3-激酶的调节作用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jan 15;17(2):206-11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0434. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
9
A statistical framework for differential network analysis from microarray data.一种基于微阵列数据的差异网络分析的统计框架。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 19;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-95.
10
Reconstruction of genetic association networks from microarray data: a partial least squares approach.基于微阵列数据重建基因关联网络:一种偏最小二乘法
Bioinformatics. 2008 Feb 15;24(4):561-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm640. Epub 2008 Jan 18.