Berhan Yifru, Berhan Asres
Hawassa University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics.
Hawassa University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacology.
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014 Sep;24 Suppl(0 Suppl):55-68. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.6s.
In several developing countries, achieving Millennium Development Goal 4 is still off track. Multiple maternal and fetal risk factors were inconsistently attributed to the high perinatal mortality in developing countries. However, there was no meta-analysis that assessed the pooled effect of these factors on perinatal mortality. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify maternal and fetal factors predicting perinatal mortality.
In this meta-analysis, we included 23 studies that assessed perinatal mortality in relation to antenatal care, parity, mode of delivery, gestational age, birth weight and sex of the fetus. A computer based search of articles was conducted mainly in the databases of PUBMED, MEDLINE, HINARI, AJOL, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library. The overall odds ratios (OR) were determined by the random-effect model. Heterogeneity testing and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.
The pooled analysis showed a strong association of perinatal mortality with lack of antenatal care (OR=3.2), prematurity (OR=7.9), low birth weight (OR=9.6), and marginal association with primigravidity (OR=1.5) and male sex (OR=1.2). The regression analysis also showed down-going trend lines of stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates in relation to the proportion of antenatal care. The metaanalysis showed that there was no association between mode of delivery and perinatal mortality.
The present meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in perinatal mortality among women who attended antenatal care, gave birth to term and normal birth weight baby. However, the association of perinatal mortality with parity, mode of delivery and fetal sex needs further investigation.
在一些发展中国家,实现千年发展目标4仍未步入正轨。多种孕产妇和胎儿风险因素被不一致地归因于发展中国家较高的围产期死亡率。然而,尚无荟萃分析评估这些因素对围产期死亡率的综合影响。本荟萃分析的目的是确定预测围产期死亡率的孕产妇和胎儿因素。
在本荟萃分析中,我们纳入了23项评估围产期死亡率与产前护理、产次、分娩方式、孕周、出生体重和胎儿性别的研究。主要在PUBMED、MEDLINE、HINARI、AJOL、谷歌学术和考克兰图书馆的数据库中进行基于计算机的文献检索。总体优势比(OR)由随机效应模型确定。还进行了异质性检验和敏感性分析。
汇总分析显示围产期死亡率与缺乏产前护理(OR = 3.2)、早产(OR = 7.9)、低出生体重(OR = 9.6)密切相关,与初产(OR = 1.5)和男性胎儿(OR = 1.2)存在边缘关联。回归分析还显示死产率和新生儿死亡率与产前护理比例呈下降趋势线。荟萃分析表明分娩方式与围产期死亡率之间无关联。
本荟萃分析表明,接受产前护理、足月分娩且出生体重正常的女性围产期死亡率显著降低。然而,围产期死亡率与产次、分娩方式和胎儿性别的关联需要进一步研究。