Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street, A875, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2014 Dec 5;6(4):2356-68. doi: 10.3390/cancers6042356.
Background. While neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy has improved outcomes for esophageal cancer patients, surgical complication rates remain high. The most frequent perioperative complications after trimodality therapy were cardiopulmonary in nature. The radiation modality utilized can be a strong mitigating factor of perioperative complications given the location of the esophagus and its proximity to the heart and lungs. The purpose of this study is to make a dosimetric comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), proton and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with regard to reducing perioperative cardiopulmonary complications in esophageal cancer patients. Materials. Ten patients with esophageal cancer treated between 2010 and 2013 were evaluated in this study. All patients were simulated with contrast-enhanced CT imaging. Separate treatment plans using proton radiotherapy, IMRT, and 3D-CRT modalities were created for each patient. Dose-volume histograms were calculated and analyzed to compare plans between the three modalities. The organs at risk (OAR) being evaluated in this study are the heart, lungs, and spinal cord. To determine statistical significance, ANOVA and two-tailed paired t-tests were performed for all data parameters. Results. The proton plans showed decreased dose to various volumes of the heart and lungs in comparison to both the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. There was no difference between the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans in dose delivered to the lung or heart. This finding was seen consistently across the parameters analyzed in this study. Conclusions. In patients receiving radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, proton plans are technically feasible while achieving adequate coverage with lower doses delivered to the lungs and cardiac structures. This may result in decreased cardiopulmonary toxicity and less morbidity to esophageal cancer patients.
新辅助同步放化疗已改善食管癌患者的预后,但手术并发症发生率仍居高不下。三模态治疗后最常见的围手术期并发症为心肺相关。由于食管的位置及其与心脏和肺部的毗邻关系,放射治疗方式可以成为减轻围手术期并发症的重要因素。本研究旨在比较调强放疗(IMRT)、质子和三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)在降低食管癌患者围手术期心肺并发症方面的剂量学差异。
本研究评估了 2010 年至 2013 年间接受治疗的 10 例食管癌患者。所有患者均采用增强 CT 模拟成像。为每位患者分别创建质子放疗、IMRT 和 3D-CRT 治疗计划。计算并分析剂量-体积直方图,以比较三种模式之间的计划。本研究评估的危险器官(OAR)是心脏、肺和脊髓。为确定统计学意义,对所有数据参数均进行了方差分析和双尾配对 t 检验。
与 IMRT 和 3D-CRT 计划相比,质子计划显示出对心脏和肺部各体积的剂量降低。在肺或心脏的剂量分布上,IMRT 和 3D-CRT 计划之间无差异。在本研究分析的所有参数中,均观察到了这种一致性的发现。
在接受食管癌放射治疗的患者中,质子计划在技术上是可行的,同时能够达到足够的覆盖范围,同时对肺部和心脏结构的剂量较低。这可能会降低心肺毒性,减少食管癌患者的发病率。