Strøm Henriette Kyrrestad, Adolfsen Frode, Fossum Sturla, Kaiser Sabine, Martinussen Monica
Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Dec 13;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-48.
Preventive interventions for adolescents are an important priority within school systems. Several interventions have been developed, but the effectiveness of such interventions varies considerably between studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of universal school-based prevention programs on alcohol use among adolescents by using meta-analytic techniques.
A systematic literature search in the databases, PubMed (Medline), PsycINFO (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and WEB of Science (ISI) was conducted to search for empirical articles published in the period January 1990 to August 2014.
In total, 28 randomized controlled studies with 39,289 participants at baseline were included. Of these 28 articles, 12 studies (N = 16279) reported continuous outcomes (frequency of alcohol use and quantity of alcohol use), and 16 studies (N = 23010) reported categorical data (proportion of students who drank alcohol). The results of the random effects analyses showed that the overall effect size among studies reporting continuous outcomes was small and demonstrated a favorable effect from the preventive interventions (Hedges' g = 0.22, p < .01). The effect size among studies reporting categorical outcomes was not significant (OR = 0.94, p = .25). The level of heterogeneity between studies was found to be significant in most analyses. Moderator analyses conducted to explore the heterogeneity showed neither significant difference between the different school levels (junior high schools and high schools), nor between the varied program intensities (low, medium and high intensity programs). The meta-regression analyses examining continuous moderators showed no significant effects for age or gender.
The findings from this meta-analysis showed that, overall, the effects of school-based preventive alcohol interventions on adolescent alcohol use were small but positive among studies reporting the continuous measures, whereas no effect was found among studies reporting the categorical outcomes. Possible population health outcomes, with recommendations for policy and practice, are discussed further in this paper.
针对青少年的预防性干预措施是学校系统中的一项重要优先事项。已经开发了多种干预措施,但这些干预措施的有效性在不同研究之间差异很大。本研究的目的是通过使用荟萃分析技术评估基于学校的普遍预防计划对青少年饮酒的有效性。
在PubMed(Medline)、PsycINFO(Ovid)、EMBASE(Ovid)和科学网(ISI)数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以查找1990年1月至2014年8月期间发表的实证文章。
总共纳入了28项随机对照研究,基线时有39289名参与者。在这28篇文章中,12项研究(N = 16279)报告了连续性结果(饮酒频率和饮酒量),16项研究(N = 23010)报告了分类数据(饮酒学生的比例)。随机效应分析结果表明,报告连续性结果的研究中的总体效应量较小,且显示出预防干预措施的有利效果(Hedges' g = 0.22,p <.01)。报告分类结果的研究中的效应量不显著(OR = 0.94,p =.25)。在大多数分析中发现研究之间的异质性水平显著。为探索异质性而进行的调节分析表明,不同学校级别(初中和高中)之间以及不同计划强度(低、中、高强度计划)之间均无显著差异。检验连续性调节因素的荟萃回归分析表明,年龄或性别没有显著影响。
这项荟萃分析的结果表明,总体而言,在报告连续性测量的研究中,基于学校的预防性酒精干预措施对青少年饮酒的影响虽小但呈阳性,而在报告分类结果的研究中未发现影响。本文进一步讨论了可能的人群健康结果以及对政策和实践的建议。