Li Ming D, Wang Ju, Niu Tianhua, Ma Jennie Z, Seneviratne Chamindi, Ait-Daoud Nassima, Saadvandi Jim, Morris Rana, Weiss David, Campbell Jan, Haning William, Mawhinney David J, Weis Denis, McCann Michael, Stock Christopher, Kahn Roberta, Iturriaga Erin, Yu Elmer, Elkashef Ahmed, Johnson Bankole A
Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
BMC Med Genomics. 2014 Dec 12;7:65. doi: 10.1186/s12920-014-0065-x.
Developing efficacious medications to treat methamphetamine dependence is a global challenge in public health. Topiramate (TPM) is undergoing evaluation for this indication. The molecular mechanisms underlying its effects are largely unknown. Examining the effects of TPM on genome-wide gene expression in methamphetamine addicts is a clinically and scientifically important component of understanding its therapeutic profile.
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 140 individuals who met the DSM-IV criteria for methamphetamine dependence were randomized to receive either TPM or placebo, of whom 99 consented to participate in our genome-wide expression study. The RNA samples were collected from whole blood for 50 TPM- and 49 placebo-treated participants at three time points: baseline and the ends of weeks 8 and 12. Genome-wide expression profiles and pathways of the two groups were compared for the responders and non-responders at Weeks 8 and 12. To minimize individual variations, expression of all examined genes at Weeks 8 and 12 were normalized to the values at baseline prior to identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways.
At the single-gene level, we identified 1054, 502, 204, and 404 genes at nominal P values < 0.01 in the responders vs. non-responders at Weeks 8 and 12 for the TPM and placebo groups, respectively. Among them, expression of 159, 38, 2, and 21 genes was still significantly different after Bonferroni corrections for multiple testing. Many of these genes, such as GRINA, PRKACA, PRKCI, SNAP23, and TRAK2, which are involved in glutamate receptor and GABA receptor signaling, are direct targets for TPM. In contrast, no TPM drug targets were identified in the 38 significant genes for the Week 8 placebo group. Pathway analyses based on nominally significant genes revealed 27 enriched pathways shared by the Weeks 8 and 12 TPM groups. These pathways are involved in relevant physiological functions such as neuronal function/synaptic plasticity, signal transduction, cardiovascular function, and inflammation/immune function.
Topiramate treatment of methamphetamine addicts significantly modulates the expression of genes involved in multiple biological processes underlying addiction behavior and other physiological functions.
开发有效的药物来治疗甲基苯丙胺成瘾是全球公共卫生领域面临的一项挑战。托吡酯(TPM)正在针对这一适应症进行评估。其作用的分子机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。研究TPM对甲基苯丙胺成瘾者全基因组基因表达的影响,是了解其治疗特性的临床和科学重要组成部分。
在这项双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,140名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)甲基苯丙胺成瘾标准的个体被随机分配接受TPM或安慰剂治疗,其中99人同意参与我们的全基因组表达研究。在三个时间点从50名接受TPM治疗和49名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者的全血中收集RNA样本:基线以及第8周和第12周结束时。比较了第8周和第12周时两组中反应者和无反应者的全基因组表达谱和通路。为了尽量减少个体差异,在鉴定差异表达基因和通路之前,将第8周和第12周所有检测基因的表达水平相对于基线值进行标准化。
在单基因水平上,我们分别在第8周和第12周时,在TPM组和安慰剂组的反应者与无反应者中,鉴定出名义P值<0.01的基因有1054个、502个、204个和404个。其中,经过多重检验的Bonferroni校正后,159个、38个、2个和21个基因的表达仍有显著差异。这些基因中的许多,如参与谷氨酸受体和GABA受体信号传导的GRINA、PRKACA、PRKCI、SNAP23和TRAK2,是TPM的直接靶点。相比之下,在第8周安慰剂组的38个显著基因中未鉴定出TPM药物靶点。基于名义上显著的基因进行通路分析,发现第8周和第12周的TPM组共有27条富集通路。这些通路涉及相关生理功能,如神经元功能/突触可塑性、信号转导、心血管功能以及炎症/免疫功能。
托吡酯治疗甲基苯丙胺成瘾者可显著调节参与成瘾行为及其他生理功能的多个生物学过程相关基因的表达。