Reuter Martin, Tisdall M Dylan, Qureshi Abid, Buckner Randy L, van der Kouwe André J W, Fischl Bruce
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Imaging biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data are used to quantify normal development, disease, and the effects of disease-modifying therapies. However, motion during image acquisition introduces image artifacts that, in turn, affect derived markers. A systematic effect can be problematic since factors of interest like age, disease, and treatment are often correlated with both a structural change and the amount of head motion in the scanner, confounding the ability to distinguish biology from artifact. Here we evaluate the effect of head motion during image acquisition on morphometric estimates of structures in the human brain using several popular image analysis software packages (FreeSurfer 5.3, VBM8 SPM, and FSL Siena 5.0.7). Within-session repeated T1-weighted MRIs were collected on 12 healthy volunteers while performing different motion tasks, including two still scans. We show that volume and thickness estimates of the cortical gray matter are biased by head motion with an average apparent volume loss of roughly 0.7%/mm/min of subject motion. Effects vary across regions and remain significant after excluding scans that fail a rigorous quality check. In view of these results, the interpretation of reported morphometric effects of movement disorders or other conditions with increased motion tendency may need to be revisited: effects may be overestimated when not controlling for head motion. Furthermore, drug studies with hypnotic, sedative, tranquilizing, or neuromuscular-blocking substances may contain spurious "effects" of reduced atrophy or brain growth simply because they affect motion distinct from true effects of the disease or therapeutic process.
源自磁共振成像(MRI)数据的成像生物标志物用于量化正常发育、疾病以及疾病修饰疗法的效果。然而,图像采集过程中的运动引入了图像伪影,进而影响衍生标志物。系统性影响可能会带来问题,因为诸如年龄、疾病和治疗等感兴趣的因素通常与结构变化以及扫描仪中的头部运动量相关,这会混淆区分生物学因素与伪影的能力。在此,我们使用几种流行的图像分析软件包(FreeSurfer 5.3、VBM8 SPM和FSL Siena 5.0.7)评估图像采集过程中头部运动对人类大脑结构形态测量估计的影响。在12名健康志愿者执行不同运动任务(包括两次静止扫描)时,采集了会话内重复的T1加权MRI图像。我们发现,皮质灰质的体积和厚度估计会受到头部运动的影响,受试者运动平均表观体积损失约为0.7%/毫米/分钟。不同区域的影响有所不同,在排除未通过严格质量检查的扫描后,影响仍然显著。鉴于这些结果,对于已报道的运动障碍或其他运动倾向增加的病症的形态测量影响进行解释时,可能需要重新审视:在未控制头部运动的情况下,影响可能被高估。此外,使用催眠、镇静、安定或神经肌肉阻滞剂物质的药物研究可能包含假性“效果”,即萎缩或脑生长减少,仅仅是因为这些物质影响了运动,而不是疾病或治疗过程的真实效果。