• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why loose rings can be tight: the role of learned object knowledge in the development of Korean spatial fit terms.

作者信息

Chang Franklin, Choi Youngon, Ko Yeonjung

机构信息

Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.002
PMID:25498745
Abstract

The Korean fit distinction has been at the center of a debate about whether language can influence spatial concepts. Most research on this issue has largely assumed that the concepts that support Korean fit terms are signaled by innate abstract visual cues (e.g., relative motion of objects), while linguistic studies in Korean suggest that fit terms are object-specific. To examine this issue, Korean-speaking three- to six year-old children and adults were asked to describe spatial scenes, which varied in object type/relations and visual cues for fit. Both groups relied on the prototypical relation between pairs of objects (e.g., rings tend to fit tightly on fingers) in selecting tight-fit terms, and this dependence increased with age. In contrast to Whorfian and Conceptual tuning accounts (Bowerman & Choi, 2003; Hespos & Spelke, 2004), these results suggest that Korean fit concepts are not entirely innate or abstract.

摘要

相似文献

1
Why loose rings can be tight: the role of learned object knowledge in the development of Korean spatial fit terms.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
2
What Develops in Infants' Spatial Categorization? Korean Infants' Categorization of Containment and Tight-Fit Relations.婴儿的空间分类是如何发展的?韩国婴儿对包含和紧密贴合关系的分类。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):e382-e396. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12903. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
The impact of object type on the spatial analogies in Korean preschoolers.物体类型对韩国学龄前儿童空间类比的影响。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 May;94:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Revisiting the role of language in spatial cognition: Categorical perception of spatial relations in English and Korean speakers.重新审视语言在空间认知中的作用:英语和韩语使用者对空间关系的范畴知觉。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):2031-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1268-x.
5
Spatial Semantics, Cognition, and Their Interaction: A Comparative Study of Spatial Categorization in English and Korean.空间语义学、认知及其相互作用:英语和韩语空间范畴的比较研究
Cogn Sci. 2018 May 22. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12622.
6
Understanding developmental changes in the stability and flexibility of spatial categories based on object relatedness.基于物体关联性理解空间类别的稳定性和灵活性的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):218-32. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.218.
7
Tight and loose are not created equal: an asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers.“紧”与“松”并非等同:英韩双语者对“合身”概念的表征存在潜在不对称性。
Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
8
To generalize or not to generalize: spatial categories are influenced by physical attributes and language.归纳还是不归纳:空间类别受物理属性和语言的影响。
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):88-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00749.x.
9
The development of knowledge about visual perception.视觉感知知识的发展。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1977;25:43-76.
10
What does children's spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions.儿童的空间语言揭示了哪些关于空间概念的信息?来自容器表达使用的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;38(5):881-910. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12106. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Language Background on Gaze Behavior: A Crosslinguistic Comparison Between Korean and German Speakers.语言背景对注视行为的影响:韩语和德语使用者的跨语言比较
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Dec 31;13(4):267-279. doi: 10.5709/acp-0227-z. eCollection 2017.