• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“紧”与“松”并非等同:英韩双语者对“合身”概念的表征存在潜在不对称性。

Tight and loose are not created equal: an asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers.

作者信息

Norbury Heather M, Waxman Sandra R, Song Hyun-Joo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019
PMID:19010464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2617708/
Abstract

Research concerning the spatial dimension fit (tight versus loose) has been based on a tacit but untested assumption that the dimension fit is symmetrical, with tight- and loose-fitting relations highlighting the dimension fit with equal force. We propose a reformulation, documenting that adult speakers of English (Experiment 1) and Korean (Experiment 2) are sensitive to the dimension fit, but that their representation is asymmetric, with tight-fitting events highlighting fit with greater force than loose-fitting events. We propose that sensitivity to the dimension fit is more resilient than has previously been suggested, and that the asymmetry documented here provides a foundation upon which to pursue nuanced questions about the relationship between language and our underlying representations of space.

摘要

关于空间维度适配(紧密与宽松)的研究一直基于一个隐含但未经检验的假设,即维度适配是对称的,紧密适配和宽松适配关系对维度适配的凸显力度相同。我们提出一种重新表述,证明以英语为母语的成年人(实验1)和以韩语为母语的成年人(实验2)对维度适配敏感,但他们的表征是不对称的,紧密适配事件比宽松适配事件更有力地凸显适配。我们认为,对维度适配的敏感性比之前所认为的更具弹性,此处记录的不对称性为探讨语言与我们对空间的潜在表征之间关系的细微问题提供了基础。

相似文献

1
Tight and loose are not created equal: an asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English- and Korean-speakers.“紧”与“松”并非等同:英韩双语者对“合身”概念的表征存在潜在不对称性。
Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
2
Relative contribution of perception/cognition and language on spatial categorization.感知/认知和语言对空间分类的相对贡献。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):102-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01201.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
3
Spatial Semantics, Cognition, and Their Interaction: A Comparative Study of Spatial Categorization in English and Korean.空间语义学、认知及其相互作用:英语和韩语空间范畴的比较研究
Cogn Sci. 2018 May 22. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12622.
4
Whereof one cannot speak: How language and capture of visual attention interact.无法言说的事物:语言和视觉注意力捕获如何相互作用。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104023. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104023. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
What Develops in Infants' Spatial Categorization? Korean Infants' Categorization of Containment and Tight-Fit Relations.婴儿的空间分类是如何发展的?韩国婴儿对包含和紧密贴合关系的分类。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):e382-e396. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12903. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Why loose rings can be tight: the role of learned object knowledge in the development of Korean spatial fit terms.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
Conceptual precursors to language.语言的概念先驱。
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):453-6. doi: 10.1038/nature02634.
8
Does language rule perception? Testing a radical view of linguistic relativity.语言决定认知吗?检验一种关于语言相对论的激进观点。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):794-824. doi: 10.1037/xge0001296. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Learning to form a spatial category of tight-fit relations: how experience with a label can give a boost.学习形成紧身贴合关系的空间类别:标签体验如何起到促进作用。
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):711-23. doi: 10.1037/a0015475.
10
Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults.理解空间关系:灵活的婴儿,有语言能力的成年人。
Cogn Psychol. 2003 May;46(3):229-59. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00514-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Phone in a Basket Looks Like a Knife in a Cup: Role-Filler Independence in Visual Processing.篮子里的手机看起来像杯子里的刀:视觉处理中的角色填充独立性
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 12;8:766-794. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00146. eCollection 2024.
2
Relative contribution of perception/cognition and language on spatial categorization.感知/认知和语言对空间分类的相对贡献。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):102-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01201.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Young children's rapid learning about artifacts.幼儿对人工制品的快速学习。
Dev Sci. 2005 Nov;8(6):472-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00438.x.
2
Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations.语言能起到引导作用吗?语言输入对婴儿支持性空间关系分类的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):183-92. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.183.
3
Conceptual precursors to language.语言的概念先驱。
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):453-6. doi: 10.1038/nature02634.
4
The sources of young children's name innovations for novel artifacts.幼儿对新奇物品命名创新的来源。
J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):823-43. doi: 10.1017/s0305000903005798.
5
Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations.6个月大婴儿对包容空间关系的分类。
Child Dev. 2003 May-Jun;74(3):679-93. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00562.
6
Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults.理解空间关系:灵活的婴儿,有语言能力的成年人。
Cogn Psychol. 2003 May;46(3):229-59. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00514-5.
7
Children's reliance on creator's intent in extending names for artifacts.儿童在为人工制品扩展名称时对创造者意图的依赖。
Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):164-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01436.
8
Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition.摇摆、晃动与滚动:语言和认知中运动的表征
Cognition. 2002 Jun;84(2):189-219. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00046-x.
9
Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.扭转局面:语言与空间推理
Cognition. 2002 Apr;83(3):265-94. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00009-4.
10
Motion events in language and cognition.语言与认知中的运动事件。
Cognition. 2002 Feb;83(1):49-79. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00166-4.