Hays Ron D, Revicki Dennis A, Feeny David, Fayers Peter, Spritzer Karen L, Cella David
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, UCLA, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
Outcomes Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Oct;34(10):1015-22. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0408-x.
Preference-based health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) scores are useful as outcome measures in clinical studies, for monitoring the health of populations, and for estimating quality-adjusted life-years.
This was a secondary analysis of data collected in an internet survey as part of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) project. To estimate Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) preference scores, we used the ten PROMIS(®) global health items, the PROMIS-29 V2.0 single pain intensity item and seven multi-item scales (physical functioning, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, sleep disturbance), and the PROMIS-29 V2.0 items. Linear regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors, followed by simple linear equating to avoid regression to the mean.
The regression models explained 48 % (global health items), 61 % (PROMIS-29 V2.0 scales), and 64 % (PROMIS-29 V2.0 items) of the variance in the HUI-3 preference score. Linear equated scores were similar to observed scores, although differences tended to be larger for older study participants.
HUI-3 preference scores can be estimated from the PROMIS(®) global health items or PROMIS-29 V2.0. The estimated HUI-3 scores from the PROMIS(®) health measures can be used for economic applications and as a measure of overall HR-QOL in research.
基于偏好的健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)评分在临床研究中作为结局指标、监测人群健康以及估算质量调整生命年方面很有用。
这是对作为患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS(®))项目一部分的互联网调查中收集的数据进行的二次分析。为了估算健康效用指数Mark 3(HUI-3)偏好评分,我们使用了十个PROMIS(®)总体健康项目、PROMIS-29 V2.0单一疼痛强度项目和七个多项目量表(身体功能、疲劳、疼痛干扰、抑郁症状、焦虑、参与社会角色和活动的能力、睡眠障碍)以及PROMIS-29 V2.0项目。采用线性回归分析来确定显著预测因素,随后进行简单线性等值以避免均值回归。
回归模型解释了HUI-3偏好评分中48%(总体健康项目)、61%(PROMIS-29 V2.0量表)和64%(PROMIS-29 V2.0项目)的方差。线性等值评分与观察评分相似,尽管老年研究参与者的差异往往更大。
HUI-3偏好评分可从PROMIS(®)总体健康项目或PROMIS-29 V2.0估算得出。从PROMIS(®)健康测量中估算出的HUI-3评分可用于经济应用,并作为研究中总体HR-QOL的一项指标。