• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大药品报销的演变:针对新药的泛加拿大药品联盟

Evolution of drug reimbursement in Canada: the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance for new drugs.

作者信息

Husereau Don, Dempster William, Blanchard Adrienne, Chambers Johanne

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

3Sixty Public Affairs, Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2673. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2673
PMID:25498784
Abstract

Canada has a unique system of public drug coverage and reimbursement characterized by a centralized review agency that makes funding recommendations along with decentralized authority for delivering health care across 10 provinces and three territories. There has been a significant increase in price negotiation for new pharmaceuticals in the past 10 years, first by individual provinces and now through a collective price negotiation process called the "Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance." As of February 2014, the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance has already completed 32 negotiations despite still being in a formative stage; it is anticipated that a formal process will be developed in the coming year. In this article, we describe the evolution of price negotiation in Canada and identify several opportunities for improvement of the current process, including the incorporation of economic considerations into price negotiation.

摘要

加拿大拥有独特的公共药品覆盖和报销体系,其特点是有一个中央审查机构负责提出资金建议,同时在10个省和3个地区拥有分散的医疗保健提供权力。在过去10年里,新药品价格谈判显著增加,先是个别省份进行谈判,现在则通过一个名为“泛加拿大药品联盟”的集体价格谈判过程进行。截至2014年2月,尽管仍处于形成阶段,泛加拿大药品联盟已经完成了32次谈判;预计明年将制定一个正式程序。在本文中,我们描述了加拿大价格谈判的演变,并确定了当前程序改进的几个机会,包括将经济因素纳入价格谈判。

相似文献

1
Evolution of drug reimbursement in Canada: the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance for new drugs.加拿大药品报销的演变:针对新药的泛加拿大药品联盟
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2673. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
2
Activities of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance: An Observational Analysis.泛加拿大制药联盟的活动:一项观察性分析。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 7;25(2):e12-e22. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.2.2.
3
Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access?加拿大罕见病新药的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:是否能提高患者的可及性?
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 13;27(1):e48-e64. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.658.
4
The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.经济证据在加拿大肿瘤学报销决策中的作用:从拉姆达到更远。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):771-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00298.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
5
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
6
Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.利用有效性和成本效益来做出药物覆盖范围决策:英国、澳大利亚和加拿大的比较
JAMA. 2009 Oct 7;302(13):1437-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1409.
7
Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估过程:加拿大药品和卫生技术局(CADTH)的变化对公共支付方报销建议的影响
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030127.
8
Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA): Timelines Analysis and Policy Implications.泛加拿大药品联盟(pCPA):时间线分析及政策影响
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 18;9:1578. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01578. eCollection 2018.
9
Canadian policy makers' views on pharmaceutical reimbursement contracts involving confidential discounts from drug manufacturers.加拿大政策制定者对涉及药品制造商机密折扣的药品报销合同的看法。
Health Policy. 2013 Oct;112(3):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
10
Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?加拿大罕见病药物的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:谁受益?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Added Therapeutic Benefits of Top-Selling Drugs in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Health Technology Assessment.日本畅销药物的额外治疗益处:一项使用卫生技术评估的横断面研究
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70243. doi: 10.1111/cts.70243.
2
Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses.2018年至2022年加拿大非肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估报告:对制造商提交材料的方法学批判以及制造商与加拿大卫生药物和技术局(CADTH)分析之间的比较。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00511-9. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
The pan-Canadian Tiered Pricing Framework and Chinese National Volume-Based Procurement: A comparative study using Donabedian's structure-process-outcome framework.泛加分层定价框架与中国国家基于量的采购:运用 Donabedian 的结构-过程-结果框架进行的比较研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Nov 10;13:04137. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04137.
4
Reimbursement decision-making system in Poland systematically compared to other countries.波兰的报销决策系统与其他国家进行了系统比较。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1153680. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153680. eCollection 2023.
5
Added Therapeutic Benefit of Top-Selling Brand-name Drugs in Medicare.增加了医疗保险中最畅销的品牌药物的治疗效益。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1283-1289. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4034.
6
Do Health Technology Assessment organisations consider manufacturers' costs in relation to drug price? A study of reimbursement reports.卫生技术评估组织在确定药品价格时会考虑制造商的成本吗?一项关于报销报告的研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Aug 31;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00383-y.
7
Impacts of National Drug Price Negotiation on Expenditure, Volume, and Availability of Targeted Anti-Cancer Drugs in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.国家药品价格谈判对中国靶向抗癌药物支出、用量和可及性的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;19(8):4578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084578.
8
Value-based pricing: Toward achieving a balance between individual and population gains in health benefits.基于价值的定价:在医疗福利的个体获益和群体获益之间实现平衡。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2694. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
Prescription drug coverage in Canada: a review of the economic, policy and political considerations for universal pharmacare.加拿大的处方药保险范围:对全民药物保险的经济、政策和政治考量的综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Nov 7;11:28. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0154-x. eCollection 2018.
10
Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand.加拿大孤儿药常见药物评估建议:建议基础及与魁北克、澳大利亚、苏格兰和新西兰相似评估的比较。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0759-9.