Anders Christoph, Mader Lena Simone, Herzberg Max, Alex Christin
Division of Motor Research, Pathophysiology and Biomechanics, Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department for Hand, Reconstructive, and Trauma Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07740 Jena, Germany.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 27;9(4):180. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040180.
: Subjective rating scales of perceived exertion are often used to quantify effort levels during various endurance exercises, particularly submaximal tasks. The aim of the current study was to determine whether predictive conclusions can be drawn from perceived exertion levels surveyed at the start of defined submaximal endurance tasks. : In this study, healthy participants performed a 10-min endurance task at 50% of their upper body weight, targeting either the back muscles (n = 47, 24 women) or abdominal muscles (n = 32, 17 women). At the end of each minute, participants were asked to rate their perceived exertion (RPE) using the 14-points Borg Scale. Based on their initial and final RPE levels, and for each muscle group separately, participants were divided into subgroups reflecting low (good start/good end) and high (bad start/bad end) strain levels. These values were then compared over the duration of the exercise. Comparisons of RPE levels between subgroups were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test for independent samples, with Bonferroni-Holm correction to account for multiple comparisons. : Overall, strain levels increased throughout the duration of the exercise. For the abdominal muscles, the difference between the two RPE groups remained constant over time: participants with good start/end ratings consistently showed different strain levels from those with bad start/end ratings, regardless of whether the grouping was based on initial or final exertion levels. In contrast, for the back muscles, the initial grouping showed a crossover in strain values: by the end of the task, participants in the good start group tended to report higher strain than those in the bad start group. No differences were found in initial RPE values when the grouping was based on final exertion levels. : For endurance tasks involving the abdominal muscles, initial strain levels have strong predictive value, whereas this is not the case for the back muscles. Because back muscles are frequently loaded, continuous monitoring of RPE levels is necessary to prevent unexpected task failure, as initial RPE values are not predictive. In contrast, RPE values of 11 or higher on the 14-points Borg scale predict complete exhaustion or even premature task failure with high certainty for abdominal muscle exercises, while lower RPE levels indicate that exercise intensity can be increased.
主观用力感觉评分量表常用于量化各种耐力运动中的努力程度,尤其是次最大强度任务。本研究的目的是确定能否从在确定的次最大强度耐力任务开始时所调查的主观用力程度得出预测性结论。
在本研究中,健康参与者以其上身重量的50%进行10分钟的耐力任务,目标肌肉群为背部肌肉(n = 47,24名女性)或腹部肌肉(n = 32,17名女性)。在每分钟结束时,要求参与者使用14点Borg量表对其主观用力感觉(RPE)进行评分。根据参与者的初始和最终RPE水平,并分别针对每个肌肉群,将参与者分为反映低(良好起始/良好结束)和高(不良起始/不良结束)应变水平的亚组。然后在运动过程中对这些值进行比较。亚组之间RPE水平的比较使用独立样本的Mann-Whitney U检验,并采用Bonferroni-Holm校正以考虑多重比较。
总体而言,在整个运动过程中应变水平都有所增加。对于腹部肌肉,两个RPE组之间的差异随时间保持恒定:起始/结束评分良好的参与者始终表现出与起始/结束评分不良的参与者不同的应变水平,无论分组是基于初始还是最终用力水平。相比之下,对于背部肌肉,初始分组显示应变值出现交叉:在任务结束时,起始良好组的参与者往往比起始不良组的参与者报告更高的应变。当分组基于最终用力水平时,初始RPE值未发现差异。
对于涉及腹部肌肉的耐力任务,初始应变水平具有很强的预测价值,而对于背部肌肉则并非如此。由于背部肌肉经常承受负荷,因此有必要持续监测RPE水平以防止意外的任务失败,因为初始RPE值没有预测性。相比之下,在14点Borg量表上RPE值为11或更高高度确定地预测腹部肌肉运动中的完全疲劳甚至过早的任务失败,而较低的RPE水平表明可以增加运动强度。