Bland Marghuretta D, Whitson Michelle, Harris Hilary, Edmiaston Jeff, Connor Lisa Tabor, Fucetola Robert, Carter Alexandre, Corbetta Maurizio, Lang Catherine E
M.D. Bland, PT, DPT, NCS, MSCI, Program in Physical Therapy, Department of Neurology, and Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University. Mailing address: Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park, Campus Box 8502, St Louis, MO 63108 (USA).
M. Whitson, PT, MHS, MA, MBA, Barnes Jewish Hospital Rehabilitation Services, St Louis, Missouri.
Phys Ther. 2015 May;95(5):710-9. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140347. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Use of standardized assessments in acute rehabilitation is continuing to grow, a key objective being to assist clinicians in determining services needed postdischarge.
The purpose of this study was to examine how standardized assessment scores from initial acute care physical therapist and occupational therapist evaluations contribute to discharge recommendations for poststroke rehabilitation services.
A descriptive analysis was conducted.
A total of 2,738 records of patients admitted to an acute care hospital with a diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack were identified. Participants received an initial physical therapist and occupational therapist evaluation with standardized assessments and a discharge recommendation of home with no services, home with services, inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), or skilled nursing facility (SNF). A K-means clustering algorithm determined if it was feasible to categorize participants into the 4 groups based on their assessment scores. These results were compared with the physical therapist and occupational therapist discharge recommendations to determine if assessment scores guided postacute care recommendations.
Participants could be separated into 4 clusters (A, B, C, and D) based on assessment scores. Cluster A was the least impaired, followed by clusters B, C, and D. In cluster A, 50% of the participants were recommended for discharge to home without services, whereas 1% were recommended for discharge to an SNF. Clusters B, C, and D each had a large proportion of individuals recommended for discharge to an IRF (74%-80%). There was a difference in percentage of recommendations across the clusters that was largely driven by the differences between cluster A and clusters B, C, and D.
Additional unknown factors may have influenced the discharge recommendations.
Participants poststroke can be classified into meaningful groups based on assessment scores from their initial physical therapist and occupational therapist evaluations. These assessment scores, in part, guide poststroke acute care discharge recommendations.
急性康复中标准化评估的使用持续增加,一个关键目标是协助临床医生确定出院后所需的服务。
本研究的目的是探讨急性护理物理治疗师和职业治疗师初始评估的标准化评估分数如何有助于中风后康复服务的出院建议。
进行描述性分析。
共识别出2738例入住急性护理医院且诊断为中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者记录。参与者接受了物理治疗师和职业治疗师的初始评估,包括标准化评估以及出院建议,出院建议为无需服务居家、需服务居家、住院康复机构(IRF)或熟练护理机构(SNF)。K均值聚类算法确定根据参与者的评估分数将其分为4组是否可行。将这些结果与物理治疗师和职业治疗师的出院建议进行比较,以确定评估分数是否指导急性后期护理建议。
根据评估分数,参与者可分为4个聚类(A、B、C和D)。聚类A受损最轻,其次是聚类B、C和D。在聚类A中,50%的参与者被建议出院后无需服务居家,而1%的参与者被建议出院至SNF。聚类B、C和D中,各有很大比例的个体被建议出院至IRF(74%-80%)。各聚类间建议百分比存在差异,这在很大程度上是由聚类A与聚类B、C和D之间的差异驱动的。
其他未知因素可能影响了出院建议。
中风后参与者可根据其初始物理治疗师和职业治疗师评估的分数分为有意义的组。这些评估分数部分指导中风后急性护理出院建议。