Davis Mellar P, Strasser Florian, Cherny Nathan, Levan Norman
Cleveland Clinic Lerner School of Medicine Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA,
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1951-68. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2543-2. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Palliative care program structure is important to integrating palliative services into cancer care. A first step in understanding the structure of palliative care programs is to survey existing programs.
This data was generated from members of MASCC, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and the European Association of Palliative Care (EAPC) who completed the surveys on the website. A survey questionnaire was developed using the survey tool developed by Dr. Hui and colleagues by permission which was modified for the purposes of this study. Findings were described in number and percentages. Inferential statistics involved the Fisher's exact test for factors with two levels, chi-Square test for unordered categorical factors with greater than two levels, Cochran-Armitage trend test for ordered categorical factors, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for measured factors.
Sixty-two program leaders completed the survey. Most programs had been in existence greater than 5 years and were led by oncology trained physicians who had an additional specialty. Most programs had consultative services and outpatient clinics with fewer having inpatient beds and institutionally associated hospices. Most programs provided patient continuity. Patients were generally seen late in the course of illness with the average survival of 23 days when seen as inpatients and 40 days when seen as outpatients. Less than half had palliative care fellowship training programs. Most had research structures in place.
These findings differ from results reported in a previous survey which may reflect a European palliative care program structure. However, there were similarities which include a high inpatient palliative care unit mortality and short survival of patients seen as outpatients, indicating that referrals to palliative care occur late in the course of cancer.
This study not only differs in some respects to a previous survey of palliative care programs but also confirms the late referral of patients to palliative care.
姑息治疗项目结构对于将姑息服务整合到癌症护理中很重要。了解姑息治疗项目结构的第一步是对现有项目进行调查。
这些数据来自于完成网站上调查的美国临床肿瘤学会(MASCC)、欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)和欧洲姑息治疗协会(EAPC)的成员。使用许博士及其同事开发的调查工具并经许可修改后,为本研究目的制定了一份调查问卷。结果以数字和百分比描述。推断性统计包括对两个水平因素的Fisher精确检验、对两个以上水平的无序分类因素的卡方检验、对有序分类因素的Cochran-Armitage趋势检验以及对测量因素的Wilcoxon秩和检验。
62名项目负责人完成了调查。大多数项目已存在超过5年,由接受过肿瘤学培训且有额外专业的医生领导。大多数项目有咨询服务和门诊诊所,较少有住院床位和机构附属的临终关怀机构。大多数项目提供患者连续性服务。患者通常在病程后期才接受诊治,住院患者的平均生存期为23天,门诊患者为40天。不到一半的项目有姑息治疗专科培训项目。大多数项目有研究架构。
这些发现与之前一项调查所报告的结果不同,这可能反映了欧洲姑息治疗项目的结构。然而,也有相似之处,包括住院姑息治疗病房的高死亡率和门诊患者的短生存期,这表明癌症患者在病程后期才被转诊至姑息治疗。
本研究不仅在某些方面与之前对姑息治疗项目的调查不同,还证实了患者向姑息治疗的转诊较晚。