University College London, UK.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):407-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 6.
In the past 30 years there has been a growing body of research using different methods (behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological, TMS and imaging studies) asking whether processing words from different grammatical classes (especially nouns and verbs) engage different neural systems. To date, however, each line of investigation has provided conflicting results. Here we present a review of this literature, showing that once we take into account the confounding in most studies between semantic distinctions (objects vs. actions) and grammatical distinction (nouns vs. verbs), and the conflation between studies concerned with mechanisms of single word processing and those studies concerned with sentence integration, the emerging picture is relatively clear-cut: clear neural separability is observed between the processing of object words (nouns) and action words (typically verbs), grammatical class effects emerge or become stronger for tasks and languages imposing greater processing demands. These findings indicate that grammatical class per se is not an organisational principle of knowledge in the brain; rather, all the findings we review are compatible with two general principles described by typological linguistics as underlying grammatical class membership across languages: semantic/pragmatic, and distributional cues in language that distinguish nouns from verbs. These two general principles are incorporated within an emergentist view which takes these constraints into account.
在过去的 30 年中,越来越多的研究采用不同的方法(行为、电生理、神经心理学、TMS 和成像研究)来探讨处理不同语法类别(尤其是名词和动词)的单词是否涉及不同的神经系统。然而,到目前为止,每条研究线索都提供了相互矛盾的结果。在这里,我们回顾了这一文献,表明一旦我们考虑到大多数研究中语义区分(物体与动作)和语法区分(名词与动词)之间的混淆,以及关注单个单词处理机制的研究与关注句子整合的研究之间的混淆,那么当前的研究结果就相对清晰了:在处理物体词(名词)和动作词(通常是动词)时,观察到清晰的神经可分离性;对于需要更高处理要求的任务和语言,语法类别效应会出现或变得更强。这些发现表明,语法类别本身并不是大脑知识的组织原则;相反,我们回顾的所有发现都与类型学语言学所描述的两个一般原则兼容,这两个原则是语言中名词和动词之间的语义/语用和分布线索区分。这两个一般原则被纳入一个突现主义观点中,该观点考虑了这些限制。