Suppr超能文献

牙科用化学试剂对从喷砂酸蚀钛牙种植体上去除牙龈卟啉单胞菌和大肠杆菌效果的评估:一项体外研究。

Assessment of the effect of chemical agents used in dentistry on the removal of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli from sandblasted acid-etched titanium dental implants: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Ferreira Cimara Fortes, Babu Jegdish, Tipton David, Hottel Timothy Lee

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):299-307. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3703. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of chemicals to decontaminate Escherichia coli (E coli) or Porphyromonas gingivalis (P gingivalis) from sandblasted acid-etched (SAE) titanium dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SAE titanium dental implants were contaminated with E coli or P gingivalis and incubated in a sterile bacterial culture media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. The implants were treated with 10 different conditions: calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)₂] paste for 1 minute and saline irrigation for 1 minute; Ca(OH)2 paste for 1 minute and 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHXD) irrigation for 1 minute; 0.2% CHXD for 1 minute; Dakin's solution for 1 minute; tetracycline hydrochloride (T-HCl) as a 1 g per 20 mL solution for 1, 2, and 3 minutes; and T-HCl paste for 1, 2, and 3 minutes. All implants were irrigated with 1 mL of saline solution and incubated under aerobic and anaerobic conditions for 24 hours or 48 hours for E coli- and P gingivalis-contaminated implants, respectively. The control group was submitted to all procedures except for the chemical treatments. Aliquots were removed, and turbidity was measured by spectrophotometry. The level of bacterial growth in control cultures was considered to have a decontamination percentage (DC%) of 0.

RESULTS

Spectrophotometric analysis showed that all chemical treatments resulted in significantly higher DC% compared to controls for SAE implants contaminated with E coli (P < .05) or P gingivalis (P < .05). For the P gingivalis experiments, SAE implants treated with Ca(OH)₂ paste and saline solution had a lower DC% (39.3%) than those in the other treatment groups. In the E coli experiments, DC% was significantly lower for SAE implants treated with Ca(OH)₂ paste and saline solution (48.7%), Dakin's solution (92.7%), or T-HCl paste for 1 minute (96.6%) than those in the other groups.

CONCLUSION

The DC% of SAE implants contaminated with E coli or P gingivalis by means of chemicals commonly used in dentistry is high, with the exception of Ca(OH)₂ paste burnished for 1 minute and then irrigated with saline solution for 1 minute.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估化学物质对经喷砂酸蚀(SAE)处理的钛制牙科种植体上的大肠杆菌(E coli)或牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P gingivalis)的去污能力。

材料与方法

SAE钛制牙科种植体分别被大肠杆菌或牙龈卟啉单胞菌污染,并分别在有氧和厌氧条件下于无菌细菌培养基中孵育。种植体接受10种不同处理:氢氧化钙[Ca(OH)₂]糊剂处理1分钟,并用生理盐水冲洗1分钟;Ca(OH)₂糊剂处理1分钟,并用0.2%葡萄糖酸洗必泰(CHXD)冲洗1分钟;0.2% CHXD处理1分钟;达金氏溶液处理1分钟;盐酸四环素(T-HCl)配制成每20 mL含1 g的溶液,分别处理1、2和3分钟;T-HCl糊剂分别处理1、2和3分钟。所有种植体均用1 mL生理盐水冲洗,并分别在有氧和厌氧条件下孵育24小时(大肠杆菌污染的种植体)或48小时(牙龈卟啉单胞菌污染的种植体)。对照组除不进行化学处理外,接受所有其他操作。取出等分试样,用分光光度法测量浊度。对照培养物中的细菌生长水平被视为去污率(DC%)为0。

结果

分光光度分析表明,对于被大肠杆菌(P < 0.05)或牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P < 0.05)污染的SAE种植体,所有化学处理的去污率均显著高于对照组。在牙龈卟啉单胞菌实验中,用Ca(OH)₂糊剂和生理盐水处理的SAE种植体的去污率(39.3%)低于其他处理组。在大肠杆菌实验中,用Ca(OH)₂糊剂和生理盐水处理(48.7%)、达金氏溶液处理(92.7%)或T-HCl糊剂处理1分钟(96.6%)的SAE种植体的去污率显著低于其他组。

结论

牙科常用化学物质对被大肠杆菌或牙龈卟啉单胞菌污染的SAE种植体的去污率较高,但用Ca(OH)₂糊剂处理1分钟后再用生理盐水冲洗1分钟的情况除外。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验