• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非根治性切除术与旁路手术治疗胰腺癌的对比:一项连续系列和系统评价。

Non-radical resection versus bypass procedure for pancreatic cancer - a consecutive series and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.041
PMID:25511567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most survival studies comparing non-radical resections to bypass surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer often do not differentiate between an R1 and R2 resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether non-radical R1 and R2 resections have better postoperative outcomes and survival compared to a palliative bypass.

METHODS

A single center cohort study was performed analyzing mortality, morbidity and 1-year survival after R1 (tumor cells within 1 mm from the circumferential margin), R2 and bypass surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. For the systematic review, studies were identified comparing R1 or R2 resections with bypass, in patients with pancreatic cancer. Postoperative outcomes were compared including the cohort study.

RESULTS

The cohort study (n=405) showed higher morbidity rates after R1 (n=191) and R2 (n=11) resections compared to bypass (52% and 73% vs. 34%, p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality did not differ (overall 1.7%). 1-year survival rates were 71%, 46% and 32% after R1, R2 resection and bypass (p=0.6 between R2 and bypass). The systematic review identified 8 studies, after including the cohort study 1535 patients were analyzed. Increased morbidity after R1-R2 resection (48%) compared to bypass (30-34%) was found. Median survival was 14-18 months after R1 resection vs. 9-13 months after bypass and 8.5-11.5 months after R2 resection vs. 7.5-10.7 months after bypass.

CONCLUSION

An R2 resection should be avoided in patients with pancreatic cancer due to its poor prognosis. Survival benefit after an R1 resection, as compared to bypass surgery, justifies a resection despite the increased morbidity rate.

摘要

背景

大多数比较胰腺癌非根治性切除术与旁路手术的生存研究通常没有区分 R1 和 R2 切除术。本研究旨在评估非根治性 R1 和 R2 切除术与姑息性旁路相比是否具有更好的术后结果和生存。

方法

对单中心队列研究分析了 R1(肿瘤细胞距离环周切缘 1mm 以内)、R2 和旁路手术后胰腺癌患者的死亡率、发病率和 1 年生存率。对于系统评价,比较了 R1 或 R2 切除术与旁路手术治疗胰腺癌患者的研究。包括队列研究在内,比较了术后结果。

结果

队列研究(n=405)显示 R1(n=191)和 R2(n=11)切除术的发病率高于旁路(52%和 73%比 34%,p<0.01)。住院死亡率无差异(总体 1.7%)。R1、R2 切除和旁路治疗后的 1 年生存率分别为 71%、46%和 32%(R2 和旁路之间无差异,p=0.6)。系统评价确定了 8 项研究,包括队列研究后共分析了 1535 例患者。发现 R1-R2 切除术(48%)的发病率高于旁路(30-34%)。R1 切除后中位生存时间为 14-18 个月,旁路为 9-13 个月,R2 切除后为 8.5-11.5 个月,旁路为 7.5-10.7 个月。

结论

由于预后不良,R2 切除术应避免用于胰腺癌患者。与旁路手术相比,R1 切除术的生存获益证明了尽管发病率增加,但仍需要进行切除术。

相似文献

1
Non-radical resection versus bypass procedure for pancreatic cancer - a consecutive series and systematic review.非根治性切除术与旁路手术治疗胰腺癌的对比:一项连续系列和系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis.保留十二指肠的胰腺切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 3;2(2):CD011521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011521.pub2.
6
Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine tumors in the second portion of the duodenum: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature.十二指肠第二部神经内分泌肿瘤的外科治疗:单中心经验及文献系统综述
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):925-933. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1537-6. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
7
Frozen section analysis of the pancreatic margin during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Does extending the resection to obtain a secondary R0 provide a survival benefit? Results of a systematic review.胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术中胰腺切缘的冰冻切片分析:扩大切除范围以实现二次R0切除是否能带来生存获益?一项系统评价的结果
Pancreatology. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):1037-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Postoperative nutritional support after pancreaticoduodenectomy in adults.成人胰十二指肠切除术后的营养支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD014792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014792.pub2.
9
Palliative resections versus palliative bypass procedures in pancreatic cancer--a systematic review.胰腺癌的姑息性切除术与姑息性旁路手术的比较——系统评价。
Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
10
Complete mesocolic excision an assessment of feasibility and outcome.完整结肠系膜切除术:可行性与结果评估
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a literature review.内镜超声引导下胆道引流:文献综述。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Mar 27;50:e20233414. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233414-en. eCollection 2023.
2
Complete Radiologic Response of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Microwave Ablation Combined with Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy.转移性胰腺导管腺癌对微波消融联合二线姑息化疗的完全放射学缓解
Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2020 Jan 31;2020:4138215. doi: 10.1155/2020/4138215. eCollection 2020.
3
Choledochoduodenostomy: Outcomes and limitations.
胆总管十二指肠吻合术:手术效果与局限性
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov 28;8(Suppl 1):S72-S78. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_62_19. eCollection 2019 Nov.
4
Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-palliative surgery.胰腺癌的姑息治疗——姑息性手术
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 7;4:28. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.04.03. eCollection 2019.
5
Vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric venous axis is beneficial despite a high rate of R1 resection.对于胰头腺癌侵犯门静脉肠系膜静脉轴的患者,尽管R1切除率较高,但进行静脉切除仍是有益的。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Aug;22(3):261-268. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.3.261. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
6
[R1 resection for pancreatic carcinoma].[胰腺癌的R1切除术]
Chirurg. 2017 Sep;88(9):764-770. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0462-8.
7
Expression and significance of CD44 and p-AKT in pancreatic head cancer.CD44和p-AKT在胰头癌中的表达及意义
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec 15;13:334. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0746-8.
8
Prognostic value of clinicopathological characteristics in patients with pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌患者临床病理特征的预后价值
Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Oct;27(5):509-15. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.03.