Yasen Adam T, Haddad Fares S
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK,
Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1873-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2617-2. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
The incidence of periprosthetic fractures around total hip arthroplasty is increasing as patient longevity rises and the number of patients with hip implants continues to grow. Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures are associated with a well-fixed stem and have traditionally been treated with internal fixation. However, there are a subset of these fractures which fare badly when internal fixation is undertaken, and revision of the femoral component to a long-stemmed implant may be more appropriate. We look at the traditional methods of fixation, and the evidence and indications for revision of these fractures.
随着患者寿命的延长以及髋关节置换植入物患者数量的持续增加,全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的发生率正在上升。B1型假体周围股骨骨折与固定良好的股骨柄相关,传统上采用内固定治疗。然而,在进行内固定时,这些骨折中有一部分预后较差,将股骨组件翻修为长柄植入物可能更为合适。我们探讨了传统的固定方法,以及这些骨折翻修的证据和适应症。