• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对健康信息网站的信任:关于信任前提因素的系统文献综述

Trust in health information websites: A systematic literature review on the antecedents of trust.

作者信息

Kim Yeolib

机构信息

The University of Texas at Austin, USA

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):355-69. doi: 10.1177/1460458214559432. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1177/1460458214559432
PMID:25518944
Abstract

Health websites are important sources of information for consumers. In choosing websites, trust in websites largely determines which website to access and how to best utilize the information. Thus, it is critical to understand why consumers trust certain websites and distrust others. A systematic literature review was conducted with the goal of identifying the antecedents of trust in health information websites. After four rounds of screening process, 20 articles between 2000 and 2013 were harvested. Factors that determine trust are classified into individual difference antecedents, website-related antecedents, and consumer-to-website interaction-related antecedents. The most frequently studied antecedents were socio-demographics, information quality, appearance, and perceived reputation of the website. Each antecedent of trust are discussed in detail and future research directions are proposed.

摘要

健康网站是消费者重要的信息来源。在选择网站时,对网站的信任在很大程度上决定了访问哪个网站以及如何最好地利用这些信息。因此,了解消费者为何信任某些网站而不信任其他网站至关重要。为了确定健康信息网站信任的前因,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述。经过四轮筛选过程,收集了2000年至2013年间的20篇文章。决定信任的因素分为个体差异前因、网站相关前因和消费者与网站互动相关前因。研究最频繁的前因是社会人口统计学、信息质量、外观和网站的感知声誉。我们详细讨论了信任的每个前因,并提出了未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Trust in health information websites: A systematic literature review on the antecedents of trust.对健康信息网站的信任:关于信任前提因素的系统文献综述
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):355-69. doi: 10.1177/1460458214559432. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
2
Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.基于网络的健康信息中的信任与可信度:综述及未来研究议程
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7579.
3
Quality Assessment of Web-Based Information Related to Diet During Pregnancy in Pregnant Women: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.孕妇孕期饮食相关网络信息的质量评估:横断面描述性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 3;9:e64630. doi: 10.2196/64630.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Online health information on obesity in pregnancy: a systematic review.孕期肥胖的在线健康信息:一项系统综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

引用本文的文献

1
The good, the bad, and the ugly: A qualitative evaluation of web-based COVID-19 vaccine communication in Canada.好的、坏的与丑陋的:对加拿大基于网络的新冠疫苗宣传的定性评估
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2515658. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2515658. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Factors Associated With the Level of Trust in Health Information Robots Among the General Population From a Socioecological Model Perspective: Network Analysis.从社会生态模型视角看普通人群中与健康信息机器人信任水平相关的因素:网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 13;27:e68299. doi: 10.2196/68299.
3
Exploring Values Clarification and Health-Literate Design in Patient Decision Aids: A Qualitative Interview Study.
探索患者决策辅助工具中的价值观澄清与健康素养设计:一项定性访谈研究
Med Decis Making. 2025 Jul;45(5):510-521. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251334356. Epub 2025 May 14.
4
Appropriate trust in online health information is associated with information platform, commercial status, and misinformation in patients with high cardiovascular risk.对在线健康信息的适度信任与心血管高危患者的信息平台、商业状况及错误信息相关。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;11:20552076251334438. doi: 10.1177/20552076251334438. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Formative Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Websites for Men: Qualitative Study with Men at Risk of Suicide and with Potential Gatekeepers.男性自杀预防网站的形成性评估:对有自杀风险的男性和潜在守门人的定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 26;9:e59829. doi: 10.2196/59829.
6
A Model of Trust in Online COVID-19 Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.在线新冠疫情信息与建议的信任模型:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Feb 13;5:e59317. doi: 10.2196/59317.
7
Development and effectiveness evaluation of an interactive e-learning environment to enhance digital health literacy in cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开发并评估用于提高癌症患者数字健康素养的交互式电子学习环境的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 24;7:1455143. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1455143. eCollection 2025.
8
Is information evaluated subjectively? Social media has changed the way users search for medical information.信息是经过主观评估的吗?社交媒体改变了用户搜索医学信息的方式。
Digit Health. 2024 May 27;10:20552076241259039. doi: 10.1177/20552076241259039. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Empowering patients in primary care: a qualitative exploration of the usability and utility of an online diabetes self-management tool.赋能初级保健患者:在线糖尿病自我管理工具可用性和实用性的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 11;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02358-9.
10
Endorsement of COVID-19 misinformation among criminal legal involved individuals in the United States: Prevalence and relationship with information sources.美国刑事法律涉案人员对新冠错误信息的认可:流行情况及其与信息来源的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296752. eCollection 2024.