美国刑事法律涉案人员对新冠错误信息的认可:流行情况及其与信息来源的关系。

Endorsement of COVID-19 misinformation among criminal legal involved individuals in the United States: Prevalence and relationship with information sources.

机构信息

Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.

Department of ELAP, Linguistics, & Communication Studies, Montgomery College, Takoma Park, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296752. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Criminal legal system involvement (CLI) is a critical social determinant of health that lies at the intersection of multiple sources of health disparities. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbates many of these disparities, and specific vulnerabilities faced by the CLI population. This study investigated the prevalence of COVID-19-related misinformation, as well as its relationship with COVID-19 information sources used among Americans experiencing CLI. A nationally representative sample of American adults aged 18+ (N = 1,161), including a subsample of CLI individuals (n = 168), were surveyed in February-March 2021. On a 10-item test, CLI participants endorsed a greater number of misinformation statements (M = 1.88 vs. 1.27) than non-CLI participants, p < .001. CLI participants reported less use of government and scientific sources (p = .017) and less use of personal sources (p = .003) for COVID-19 information than non-CLI participants. Poisson models showed that use of government and scientific sources was negatively associated with misinformation endorsement for non-CLI participants (IRR = .841, p < .001), but not for CLI participants (IRR = .957, p = .619). These findings suggest that building and leveraging trust in important information sources are critical to the containment and mitigation of COVID-19-related misinformation in the CLI population.

摘要

刑事法律制度的参与(CLI)是一个关键的社会健康决定因素,处于多种健康差异来源的交叉点。COVID-19 大流行加剧了其中的许多差异,以及 CLI 人群面临的特定脆弱性。本研究调查了与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息的流行程度,以及其与美国 CLI 人群使用的 COVID-19 信息来源之间的关系。在 2021 年 2 月至 3 月期间,对 18 岁及以上的美国成年人进行了一项全国代表性样本调查(N = 1,161),其中包括 CLI 个体的子样本(n = 168)。在一个包含 10 个项目的测试中,CLI 参与者认可了更多的错误信息陈述(M = 1.88 比 1.27),p <.001。CLI 参与者报告称,与非 CLI 参与者相比,他们较少使用政府和科学来源(p =.017)和较少使用个人来源(p =.003)来获取 COVID-19 信息。泊松模型显示,对于非 CLI 参与者来说,使用政府和科学来源与错误信息认可呈负相关(IRR =.841,p <.001),但对于 CLI 参与者则不然(IRR =.957,p =.619)。这些发现表明,在 CLI 人群中,建立和利用对重要信息来源的信任对于遏制和减轻与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息至关重要。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索