Astley Henry C, Roberts Thomas J
Brown University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4372-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.110296.
Many animals use catapult mechanisms to produce extremely rapid movements for escape or prey capture, resulting in power outputs far beyond the limits of muscle. In these catapults, muscle contraction loads elastic structures, which then recoil to release the stored energy extremely rapidly. Many arthropods employ anatomical 'catch mechanisms' to lock the joint in place during the loading period, which can then be released to allow joint motion via elastic recoil. Jumping vertebrates lack a clear anatomical catch, yet face the same requirement to load the elastic structure prior to movement. There are several potential mechanisms to allow loading of vertebrate elastic structures, including the gravitational load of the body, a variable mechanical advantage, and moments generated by the musculature of proximal joints. To test these hypothesized mechanisms, we collected simultaneous 3D kinematics via X-ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) and single-foot forces during the jumps of three Rana pipiens. We calculated joint mechanical advantage, moment and power using inverse dynamics at the ankle, knee, hip and ilio-sacral joints. We found that the increasing proximal joint moments early in the jump allowed for high ankle muscle forces and elastic pre-loading, and the subsequent reduction in these moments allowed the ankle to extend using elastic recoil. Mechanical advantage also changed throughout the jump, with the muscle contracting against a poor mechanical advantage early in the jump during loading and a higher mechanical advantage late in the jump during recoil. These 'dynamic catch mechanisms' serve to resist joint motion during elastic loading, then allow it during elastic recoil, functioning as a catch mechanism based on the balance and orientation of forces throughout the limb rather than an anatomical catch.
许多动物利用弹射机制产生极其快速的动作以逃避或捕获猎物,其功率输出远超肌肉的极限。在这些弹射机制中,肌肉收缩加载弹性结构,然后弹性结构迅速回弹以释放储存的能量。许多节肢动物采用解剖学上的“锁定机制”在加载阶段将关节锁定在原位,随后该机制可以被释放,以使关节通过弹性回弹实现运动。会跳跃的脊椎动物没有明显的解剖学锁定结构,但在运动前同样需要加载弹性结构。有几种潜在的机制可以实现脊椎动物弹性结构的加载,包括身体的重力载荷、可变的机械优势以及近端关节肌肉组织产生的力矩。为了测试这些假设的机制,我们通过移动形态的X射线重建(XROMM)同时收集了三只北美豹蛙跳跃过程中的3D运动学数据和单脚受力情况。我们使用逆动力学计算了踝关节、膝关节、髋关节和髂骶关节的关节机械优势、力矩和功率。我们发现,跳跃早期近端关节力矩的增加使得踝关节肌肉能够产生较大的力并进行弹性预加载,随后这些力矩的减小使得踝关节能够利用弹性回弹进行伸展。在整个跳跃过程中,机械优势也发生了变化,在加载阶段早期肌肉以较差的机械优势收缩,而在回弹阶段后期则以较高的机械优势收缩。这些“动态锁定机制”在弹性加载期间起到抵抗关节运动的作用,然后在弹性回弹期间允许关节运动,其功能类似于基于整个肢体的力的平衡和方向的锁定机制,而非解剖学上的锁定结构。