• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

读者如何自动推断虚构人物的情绪状态?

How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?

作者信息

Gernsbacher Morton Ann, Hallada Brenda M, Robertson Rachel R W

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Sci Stud Read. 1998 Jul;2(3):271-300. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_5.

DOI:10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_5
PMID:25520549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266407/
Abstract

We propose that reading stories, such as a narrative about a character who takes money from a store where his best friend works and who later learns that his best friend has been fired, stimulates readers to activate the knowledge of how the character feels when he finds out that his best friend has been fired from a job for something he did. In other words, we propose that readers infer fictional character's emotional states. In this article, we first review two series of laboratory experiments (Gernsbacher, Goldsmith, & Robertson, 1992; Gernsbacher & Robertson, 1992) that empirically tested this hypothesis by measuring participants' reading times to target sentences that contained emotion words that matched (e.g., ) or mismatched (e.g., ) the implied emotional state. We then present a third series of laboratory experiments that tested how automatically such knowledge is activated by using a divided-attention task (tone-identification, per-sentence memory load, or cumulative memory load) and by comparing target-sentence reading time when the emotional state is explicitly mentioned versus only implicit.

摘要

我们认为,阅读故事,比如一个关于某个角色从他最好的朋友工作的商店偷钱,而后得知他最好的朋友因他的所作所为而被解雇的故事,会促使读者激活关于该角色发现自己害得最好的朋友丢了工作时感受如何的知识。换句话说,我们认为读者能够推断虚构角色的情绪状态。在本文中,我们首先回顾两组实验室实验(格恩斯巴赫、戈德史密斯和罗伯逊,1992年;格恩斯巴赫和罗伯逊,1992年),这些实验通过测量参与者对包含与隐含情绪状态匹配(例如, )或不匹配(例如, )的情感词汇的目标句子的阅读时间,对这一假设进行了实证检验。然后,我们展示第三组实验室实验,该实验通过使用分心任务(音调识别、逐句记忆负荷或累积记忆负荷),并通过比较明确提及情绪状态与仅隐含情绪状态时目标句子的阅读时间,来测试这种知识被激活的自动程度。

相似文献

1
How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?读者如何自动推断虚构人物的情绪状态?
Sci Stud Read. 1998 Jul;2(3):271-300. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_5.
2
Do Readers Mentally Represent Characters' Emotional States?读者会在脑海中呈现角色的情绪状态吗?
Cogn Emot. 1992;6(2):89-111. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411061.
3
Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.在呈现虚构人物的情感状态时知识激活与句子映射的比较
Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):353-371. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409391.
4
The representation of characters' emotional responses: Do readers infer specific emotions?角色情感反应的呈现:读者能推断出特定情感吗?
Cogn Emot. 2003 May;17(3):413-428. doi: 10.1080/02699930244000048.
5
Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character's linguistic actions.阅读中的具身性:模拟故事角色的语言行为。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):364-75. doi: 10.1037/a0034853. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
Does the character-based dimension of stories impact narrative processing? An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.故事的基于字符的维度是否会影响叙事处理?一项事件相关电位 (ERP) 研究。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01070-1. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension.飞向梦幻岛:读者在阅读理解过程中如何隐性地评判规范。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1250-9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0436-8.
8
Fictional characters' emotional state representation: what is its degree of specificity?虚构人物的情绪状态表征:其具体程度如何?
Psicothema. 2009 Feb;21(1):9-14.
9
How readers experience characters' decisions.读者如何体验角色的决策。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):753-61. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.753.
10
Thinking about the past: early knowledge about links between prior experience, thinking, and emotion.思考过去:关于先前经验、思维与情感之间联系的早期认知。
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):82-102. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00267.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender-based violence in Latin America (Ecuador and Argentina): current state and challenges in the development of psychoeducational materials.拉丁美洲(厄瓜多尔和阿根廷)基于性别的暴力:心理教育材料开发的现状与挑战
Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00060-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
Can't help processing numbers with text: Eye-tracking evidence for simultaneous instead of sequential processing of text and numbers in arithmetic word problems.忍不住在处理文本时对数字进行加工:眼动追踪证据表明,在算术文字问题中,文本和数字是同时而非顺序加工的。
Psychol Res. 2025 Jan 20;89(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02069-x.
3
Exploring the Relationship Between Fiction Reading and Emotion Recognition.探究小说阅读与情感识别之间的关系。
Affect Sci. 2021 Apr 20;2(2):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00034-0. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Extended Perspective Shift and Discourse Economy in Language Processing.语言处理中的扩展视角转换与话语经济性
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 31;12:613357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613357. eCollection 2021.
5
Beyond consensus: Embracing heterogeneity in curated neuroimaging meta-analysis.超越共识:在有针对性的神经影像学荟萃分析中接受异质性。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
The functional role of the periphery in emotional language comprehension.情绪语言理解中外周的功能作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 27;4:294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00294. eCollection 2013.
7
The on-line processing of socio-emotional information in prototypical scenarios: inferences from brain potentials.原型场景中社会情感信息的在线处理:脑电证据
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Apr;7(4):457-66. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr029. Epub 2011 May 23.
8
Evil geniuses: inferences derived from evidence and preferences.邪恶天才:从证据和偏好中得出的推论。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):1103-16. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0081-4.
9
Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.可微皮质网络,用于推断人们的意图与物理因果关系。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Feb;32(2):313-29. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21021.
10
The Impact of Experiential Avoidance on the Inference of Characters' Emotions: Evidence for an Emotional Processing Bias.经验性回避对人物情绪推断的影响:情绪加工偏差的证据
Cognit Ther Res. 2010 Dec 1;34(6):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s10608-009-9262-x.

本文引用的文献

1
IN SEARCH OF GENDER NEUTRALITY: Is Singular a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic ?探寻性别中立性:单数形式是否是通指性的一种认知高效替代形式?
Psychol Sci. 1997 Mar;8(2):106-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00691.x.
2
Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.获取句子参与者:首次提及的优势。
J Mem Lang. 1988 Dec;27(6):699-717. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90016-2.
3
The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension.抑制在比喻性语言理解中的作用。
J Pragmat. 1999 Nov 2;31(12):1619-1630. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00007-7.
4
Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.在呈现虚构人物的情感状态时知识激活与句子映射的比较
Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):353-371. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409391.
5
How Natural are Conceptual Anaphors?概念照应词有多自然?
Lang Cogn Process. 1992 Aug;7(3-4):257-280. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409387.
6
Improving Written Communication Through Minimal Feedback.通过最小化反馈来改善书面沟通。
Lang Cogn Process. 1992 Feb;7(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409378.
7
Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehension.空间情境模型与文本理解。
Discourse Process. 1995 Mar;19(2):173-199. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544913.
8
In Search of Complete Comprehension: Getting "Minimalists" to Work.寻求全面理解:让“极简主义者”发挥作用。
Discourse Process. 1994 Nov;18(3):271-296. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544896.
9
Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency.构建和访问从句表征:首次提及优势与从句新近性优势。
J Mem Lang. 1989 Dec;28(6):735-755. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5.
10
Comprehending Conceptual Anaphors in Spanish.理解西班牙语中的概念照应词。
Lang Cogn Process. 1992;7(3-4):281-299. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409388.