Gilmore L Anne, Redman Leanne M
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Mar;23(3):507-11. doi: 10.1002/oby.20951. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
There is an urgent need to adopt standardized nomenclature as it relates to gestational weight gain (GWG), a more uniform approach to calculate it, and hence quantifying adherence to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines.
This perspective highlights the varying methods used to estimate GWG and discuss the advantages and limitations of each.
While these calculations could be argued to have a minimal impact on data at the population level, on the patient level, incorrectly estimating weight at conception can result in misclassification of preconception body mass index (BMI) and assignment of the IOM guidelines which inherently affect the prospective management of weight gain (and potential outcomes) during the current pregnancy.
This study recommends that preconception BMI and total GWG be determined objectively and total GWG be adjusted for length of gestation before assessing adherence to the IOM GWG guidelines.
迫切需要采用与孕期体重增加(GWG)相关的标准化术语,采用更统一的方法来计算孕期体重增加,并从而量化对2009年医学研究所(IOM)指南的遵循情况。
本观点强调了用于估算孕期体重增加的不同方法,并讨论了每种方法的优缺点。
虽然可以认为这些计算对总体水平的数据影响极小,但在患者层面,受孕时体重估算错误可能导致孕前体重指数(BMI)分类错误以及IOM指南的分配错误,这会对当前孕期体重增加的预期管理(以及潜在结果)产生内在影响。
本研究建议在评估对IOM孕期体重增加指南的遵循情况之前,应客观确定孕前BMI和孕期总体重增加量,并根据妊娠期长度对孕期总体重增加量进行调整。