Irie R, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Takano N, Suga Y, Hori M, Kamagata K, Takayama M, Yoshida M, Sato S, Hamasaki N, Oishi H, Aoki S
From the Departments of Radiology (R.I., M.S., N.T., M.H., K.K., M.T., M. Yoshida, S.S., N.H., S.A.)
From the Departments of Radiology (R.I., M.S., N.T., M.H., K.K., M.T., M. Yoshida, S.S., N.H., S.A.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 May;36(5):967-70. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4199. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Blood flow in an intracranial stent cannot be visualized with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography owing to magnetic susceptibility and radiofrequency shielding. As a novel follow-up tool after stent-assisted coil embolization, we applied MRA by using a Silent Scan algorithm that contains an ultrashort TE combined with an arterial spin-labeling technique (Silent MRA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether Silent MRA could visualize flow in an intracranial stent placed in the anterior circulation.
Nine patients treated with stent-assisted coil embolization for anterior circulation aneurysms underwent MRAs (Silent MRA and TOF MRA) and x-ray digital subtraction angiography. MRAs were performed in the same session on a 3T unit. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed the MRA images and subjectively scored flow in a stent as 1 (not visible) to 4 (excellent) by referring to the latest x-ray digital subtraction angiography image as a criterion standard.
Both observers gave MRA higher scores than TOF MRA for flow in a stent in all cases. The mean score for Silent MRA was 3.44 ± 0.53, and for TOF MRA, it was 1.44 ± 0.46 (P < .001).
Silent MRA was able to visualize flow in an intracranial stent more effectively than TOF MRA. Silent MRA might be useful for follow-up imaging after stent-assisted coil embolization, though these study results may be only preliminary due to some limitations.
由于磁敏感性和射频屏蔽,颅内支架内的血流无法通过三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影(3D TOF MRA)显示。作为支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后一种新型的随访工具,我们应用了包含超短回波时间(ultrashort TE)并结合动脉自旋标记技术的Silent Scan算法进行磁共振血管造影(Silent MRA)。本研究的目的是确定Silent MRA能否显示位于前循环的颅内支架内的血流情况。
9例接受前循环动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗的患者接受了磁共振血管造影(Silent MRA和TOF MRA)及X线数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查。在3T磁共振成像设备上于同一检查时段内进行磁共振血管造影检查。两名神经放射科医生独立评估磁共振血管造影图像,并以最新的X线数字减影血管造影图像作为标准参照,主观地将支架内血流情况评为1分(不可见)至4分(极佳)。
在所有病例中,两位观察者对支架内血流情况的评分,Silent MRA均高于TOF MRA。Silent MRA的平均评分为3.44±0.53,TOF MRA的平均评分为1.44±0.46(P<0.001)。
Silent MRA在显示颅内支架内血流方面比TOF MRA更有效。Silent MRA可能有助于支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后的随访成像,但由于存在一些局限性,这些研究结果可能仅为初步结果。